PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mullin, Donncha S.
AU  - Gadd, Danni
AU  - Russ, Tom C.
AU  - Luciano, Michelle
AU  - Muniz-Terrera, Graciela
TI  - Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome trajectories and incident dementia over 10 years
AID  - 10.1101/2023.06.22.23291741
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.06.22.23291741
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/28/2023.06.22.23291741.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/28/2023.06.22.23291741.full
AB  - Background Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome is a high-risk state for adverse health outcomes in older adults characterised by measured slow gait speed and self-reported cognitive complaints. The recent addition to the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 of robust dementia outcomes enabled us to assess the prognostic value of MCR for dementia and explore the various trajectories of participants diagnosed with MCR.Methods We classified 680 community-dwelling participants free from dementia into non-MCR or MCR groups at mean [SD] age 76.3 [0.8] years. We used Cox and competing risk regression methods, adjusted for potential confounders, to evaluate the risk of developing all-cause incident dementia over 10 years of follow-up. Secondarily, we followed the trajectories for individuals with and without MCR at baseline and categorised them into subgroups based on whether MCR was still present at the next research wave, three years later.Results The presence of MCR increased the risk of incident dementia (adjusted HR 2.34, 95%CI 1.14-4.78, p=0.020), as did fewer years of education and higher depression symptoms. However, MCR has a heterogenous progression trajectory. The MCR progression subgroups each have different prognostic values for incident dementia.Conclusion MCR showed similar prognostic ability for dementia in a Scottish cohort as for other populations. MCR could identify a target group for early interventions of modifiable risk factors to prevent incident dementia. This study illustrates the heterogeneous nature of MCR progression. Exploring the underlying reasons will be important work in future work.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article. DAG is a part-time employee of Optima partners, a health data science consultancy company. Optima had no role or influence in this study.Funding StatementThe present manuscript received no direct funding. DSM is undertaking a PhD Clinical Research Fellowship funded by the Masonic Charitable Foundation and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, United Kingdom. DSM and TCR are members of the Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, which is funded by Alzheimer Scotland. All researchers are independent of their funders. Age UK Disconnected Mind project supported data collection for the LBC1936 study, the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Economic and Social Research Council (BB/W008793/1). The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 study acknowledges the financial support of NHS Research Scotland (NRS) through the Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility. DAG is supported by funding from the Wellcome Trust 4-year PhD in Translational Neuroscience: training the next generation of basic neuroscientists to embrace clinical research [108890/Z/15/Z].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All data is available from https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts/data-access-collaborationI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. All data is available from https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts/data-access-collaboration https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts/data-access-collaboration