PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Krawczyk, Noa
AU  - Rivera, Bianca D.
AU  - Chang, Ji E.
AU  - Grivel, Margaux
AU  - Chen, Yu-Heng
AU  - Nagappala, Suhas
AU  - Englander, Honora
AU  - McNeely, Jennifer
TI  - Strategies to support substance use disorder care transitions from acute-care to community-based settings: A Scoping review and typology
AID  - 10.1101/2023.04.24.23289042
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.04.24.23289042
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/25/2023.04.24.23289042.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/25/2023.04.24.23289042.full
AB  - Background Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies.Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000-2021 that studied interventions linking SUD patients from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Results Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) followed by alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care.Conclusions Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.Competing Interest StatementNoa Krawczyk receives funds for expert testimony in ongoing opioid litigation.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers K01DA055758 and R34DA055228. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data on studies included in this scoping review are publicly available via scientific databasesSUDSubstance use disorderOUDOpioid use disorderMOUDMedications for opioid use disorderEDEmergency departmentCFIRConsolidated framework for implementation research