PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Adeyemi, Oluwaseun AU - Grudzen, Corita AU - DiMaggio, Charles AU - Wittman, Ian AU - Velez-Rosborough, Ana AU - Arcila-Mesa, Mauricio AU - Cuthel, Allison AU - Poracky, Helen AU - Meyman, Polina AU - Chodosh, Joshua TI - Pre-Injury Frailty and Clinical Care Trajectory of Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of A Large Level I US Trauma Center AID - 10.1101/2023.06.19.23291575 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.06.19.23291575 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/20/2023.06.19.23291575.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/20/2023.06.19.23291575.full AB - Background Pre-injury frailty among older trauma patients is a predictor of increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine the relationship between frailty status and the care trajectories of older adult patients who underwent frailty screening in the emergency department (ED).Methods Using a retrospective cohort design of a single institutional trauma database, we pooled data on trauma patients, 65 years and older, who had frailty screening at ED presentation (N=987). The predictor variable was frailty status, measured as either robust, pre-frail, or frail. The outcome variables were measures of clinical care trajectory: inpatient admission, length of hospital stay, home discharge, and discharge to rehabilitation. We controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, injury type and severity, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. We performed multivariable logistic and quantile regressions to measure the influence of frailty on post-trauma care trajectories.Results The mean (SD) age of the study population was 81 (9.0) years and the population was predominantly female (66%) and non-Hispanic White (64%). Compared to older adult trauma patients classified as robust, those categorized as frail had 2.8 (95% CI: 1.75 – 4.40), 0.4 (95% CI: 0.27 – 0.63), and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.38 – 3.27) times the adjusted odds of hospital admission, home discharge, and discharge to rehabilitation, respectively. Those classified as pre-frail (Adjusted MD: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.46 – 1.54) and frail (Adjusted MD: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.35 – 2.65) had longer lengths of hospital stay compared to those classified as robust.Conclusion Pre-injury frailty is a predictor of care trajectories for older-adult trauma patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The New York University Langone Health Institutional Review Board (IRB) gave ethical approval for this work (IRB ID: s15 00371).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors