PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gross, Alden L.
AU  - Li, Chihua
AU  - Briceno, Emily M.
AU  - Rentería, Miguel Arce
AU  - Jones, Richard N.
AU  - Langa, Kenneth M.
AU  - Manly, Jennifer J.
AU  - Nichols, Emma L.
AU  - Weir, David
AU  - Wong, Rebeca
AU  - Berkman, Lisa
AU  - Lee, Jinkook
AU  - Kobayashi, Lindsay C.
TI  - Harmonization of Later-Life Cognitive Function Across National Contexts: Results from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocols (HCAPs)
AID  - 10.1101/2023.06.09.23291217
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.06.09.23291217
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.09.23291217.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.09.23291217.full
AB  - Background The Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) is an innovative instrument for cross-national comparisons of later-life cognitive function, yet its suitability across diverse populations is unknown. We aimed to harmonize general and domain-specific cognitive scores from HCAPs across six countries, and evaluate precision and criterion validity of the resulting harmonized scores.Methods We statistically harmonized general and domain-specific cognitive function across the six publicly available HCAP partner studies in the United States, England, India, Mexico, China, and South Africa (N=21,141). We used an item banking approach that leveraged common cognitive test items across studies and tests that were unique to studies, as identified by a multidisciplinary expert panel. We generated harmonized factor scores for general and domain- specific cognitive function using serially estimated graded-response item response theory (IRT) models. We evaluated precision of the factor scores using test information plots and criterion validity using age, gender, and educational attainment.Findings IRT models of cognitive function in each country fit well. We compared measurement reliability of the harmonized general cognitive function factor across each cohort using test information plots; marginal reliability was high (r> 0·90) for 93% of respondents across six countries. In each country, general cognitive function scores were lower with older ages and higher with greater levels of educational attainment.Interpretation We statistically harmonized cognitive function measures across six large, population-based studies of cognitive aging in the US, England, India, Mexico, China, and South Africa. Precision of the estimated scores was excellent. This work provides a foundation for international networks of researchers to make stronger inferences and direct comparisons of cross-national associations of risk factors for cognitive outcomes.Funding National Institute on Aging (R01 AG070953, R01 AG030153, R01 AG051125, U01 AG058499; U24 AG065182; R01AG051158)Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNational Institute on Aging (R01 AG070953, R01 AG030153, R01 AG051125, U01 AG058499; U24 AG065182; R01AG051158)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:HRS HCAP: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products/hcap ELSA HCAP: https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200011#!/access-data Mex-Cog: https://www.mhasweb.org/DataProducts/HarmonizedData.aspx CHARLS HCAP: http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en/Data/Harmonized_CHARLS.htm HAALSI HCAP: https://haalsi.org/data LASI-DAD: https://g2aging.org/?section=lasi-downloads#download-listing-lasi-wave-1 I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe following are the links to which we used to access the data. Most of the studies we used were available on the "Gateway to Global Aging" (g2aging.org) website, except for the HAALSI dataset. All datasets used were publicly available data. All necessary data use agreements were signed and submitted by study team members. HRS HCAP: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products/hcap ELSA HCAP: https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200011#!/access-data Mex-Cog: https://www.mhasweb.org/DataProducts/HarmonizedData.aspx CHARLS HCAP: http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en/Data/Harmonized_CHARLS.htm HAALSI HCAP: https://haalsi.org/data LASI-DAD: https://g2aging.org/?section=lasi-downloads#download-listing-lasi-wave-1 https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products/hcap https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200011#!/access-data https://www.mhasweb.org/DataProducts/HarmonizedData.aspx http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en/Data/Harmonized_CHARLS.htm https://g2aging.org/?section=lasi-downloads#download-listing-lasi-wave-1 https://haalsi.org/data https://g2aging.org/downloads