RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reliability, validity and dimensionality of the GHQ-12 in South African populations: Structural equation modelling (SEM)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.06.06.23290967
DO 10.1101/2023.06.06.23290967
A1 Kufe, Clement Nyuyki
A1 Bernstein, Colleen
A1 Wilson, Kerry
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/10/2023.06.06.23290967.abstract
AB Introduction Health Care Workers (HCWs) were among the high-risk groups for SARS-CoV-2 infection and suffer a high burden of poor mental health including depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, avoidance and burnout. The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) has showed best fit in both a one-factor structure and a multidimensional structure for the screening of common mental disorders and psychiatric well-being. The aim was to test for the reliability and validity and ascertain the factor structure of the GHQ-12 in a South African HCW population.Methods Data was collected from 832 public hospital and clinic staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in Gauteng, South Africa. The factor structure of the GHQ12 in this professional population was examined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validity and structural equation modelling (SEM).Results The GHQ-12 median score was higher (25) in women than in men (24), p=0.044. The determinant for the correlation matrix was=0.047, the Barlett test of sphericity was p<0.001, Chi square=2086.9 and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.86. The four factors identified were labelled as Social-Dysfunction (37.8%), Anxiety-Depression (35.4%) Capable (24.9%) and Self-Efficacy (22.7%). The entire sample had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85, with 0.69 for Social-Dysfunction, 0.74 for Anxiety-Depression, 0.64 for Capable and 0.52 for Self-Efficacy in orthogonal (varimax) factor loadings.Conclusions The GHQ-12 tool displayed adequate reliability and validity in measuring psychological distress in a professional group with a four-factor model suggesting multidimensionality in this group rather than a unidimensional construct.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study received funding from the National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOH) and the Gauteng Department of Health (GDOH), Johannesburg, South Africa.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University of Witwatersrand, Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) Clearance certificate No: M2006103. Written consent was obtained from all participants before completing the anonymous online questionnaire.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors