PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sahely, Ahmad AU - Sintler, Carron AU - Soundy, Andrew AU - Rosewilliam, Sheeba TI - FEASIBILITY OF A SELF-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE MOBILITY IN THE COMMUNITY AFTER STROKE (SIMS): A MIXED-METHODS PILOT STUDY AID - 10.1101/2023.05.25.23290317 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.05.25.23290317 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/05/2023.05.25.23290317.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/05/2023.05.25.23290317.full AB - Objective To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a self-management intervention to improve mobility in the community for stroke survivors.Methods A sequential mixed methods design was used (a pilot randomised controlled trial and focus groups). Participants were adult stroke survivors within six months post discharge from hospital with functional and cognitive capacity for self-management. The intervention included education sessions, goal setting and action planning, group sessions, self-monitoring and follow up. The control group received usual care and both groups enrolled for 3 months in the study. Feasibility outcomes (recruitment and retention rates, randomisation and blinding, adherence to the intervention, collection of outcome measures, and the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention). Participants assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months for functional mobility and walking, self-efficacy, goal attainment, cognitive ability, and general health. A descriptive analysis was done for quantitative data and content analysis for the qualitative data. Findings of quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to present the final results of the study.Results Twenty-four participants were recruited and randomised into two groups (12 each). It was feasible to recruit from hospital and community and to deliver the intervention remotely. Randomisation and blinding were successful. Participants were retained (83%) at 3 months and (79.2%) at 6 months assessments. Adherence to the intervention varied due to multiple factors. Focus groups discussed participants’ motivations for joining the programme, their perspectives on the intervention (fidelity and acceptability) and methodology, perceived improvements in mobility, facilitators and challenges for self-management, and suggestions for improvement.Conclusion The self-management intervention seems feasible for implementation for stroke survivors in the community. Participants appreciated the support provided and perceived improvement in their mobility. The study was not powered enough to draw a conclusion about the efficacy of the program and a future full-scale study is warranted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN15728885Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval for this study was initially obtained in June 2020 from the Health Research Authority (HRA) at the NHS (IRAS project ID: 269079).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData can be shared anonymously by the research team if needed.