RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The effect of exercise on aerobic capacity in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.08.05.22278397
DO 10.1101/2022.08.05.22278397
A1 Hodgkiss, Daniel D.
A1 Bhangu, Gurjeet S.
A1 Lunny, Carole
A1 Jutzeler, Catherine R.
A1 Chiou, Shin-Yi
A1 Walter, Matthias
A1 Lucas, Samuel J. E.
A1 Krassioukov, Andrei V.
A1 Nightingale, Tom E.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/02/2022.08.05.22278397.1.abstract
AB Background A low level of cardiorespiratory fitness [CRF; defined as peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) or peak power output (PPO)] is a widely reported consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI) and a major risk factor associated with chronic disease. However, CRF can be modified by exercise. This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to assess whether certain SCI characteristics and/or specific exercise considerations are moderators of changes in CRF.Methods and Findings Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science) were searched from inception to March 2023. A primary meta-analysis was conducted including randomised controlled trials (RCTs; exercise interventions lasting >2 weeks relative to control groups). A secondary meta-analysis pooled independent exercise interventions >2 weeks from longitudinal pre-post and RCT studies to explore whether subgroup differences in injury characteristics and/or exercise intervention parameters explained CRF changes. Further analyses included cohort, cross-sectional and observational study designs. Outcome measures of interest were absolute (AV̇O2peak) or relative V̇O2peak (RV̇O2peak), and/or PPO. Bias/quality was assessed via The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tools. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Random effects models were used in all meta-analyses and meta-regressions.Of 21,020 identified records, 120 studies comprising 29 RCTs, 67 pre-post studies, 11 cohort, 7 cross-sectional and 6 observational studies were included. The primary meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in AV̇O2peak [0.16 (0.07, 0.25) L/min], RV̇O2peak [2.9 (1.8, 3.9) mL/kg/min] and PPO [9 (5, 14) W] with exercise, relative to controls (p<0.001). Ninety-six studies (117 independent exercise interventions comprising 1,331 participants) were included in the secondary, pooled meta-analysis which demonstrated that exercise interventions significantly improve AV̇O2peak [0.22 (0.17, 0.26) L/min], RV̇O2peak [2.8 (2.2, 3.3) mL/kg/min], and PPO [11 (9, 13) W] (p<0.001). There were subgroup differences for RV̇O2peak based on exercise modality (p=0.002) and intervention length (p=0.01), but there were no differences for AV̇O2peak. There were subgroup differences (p≤0.008) for PPO based on time since injury, neurological level of injury, exercise modality, relative exercise intensity, exercise intensity prescription method, and frequency. The meta-regression found that studies with a higher mean age of participants were associated with smaller changes in AV̇O2peak and RV̇O2peak (p<0.10). GRADE indicated a moderate level of certainty in the estimated effect for RV̇O2peak, but low levels for AV̇O2peak and PPO. This review may be limited by the small number of RCTs, which prevented a subgroup analysis within this specific study design.Conclusions Performing exercise >2 weeks results in significant improvements to AV̇O2peak, RV̇O2peak and PPO in individuals with SCI. Subgroup comparisons identified that exercise interventions lasting up to 12 weeks yield the greatest change in RV̇O2peak. Upper-body aerobic exercise and resistance training also appear the most effective at improving RV̇O2peak and PPO. Furthermore, acutely-injured, individuals with paraplegia, exercising at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity, prescribed via a percentage of oxygen consumption or heart rate, for ≥3 sessions/week will likely experience the greatest change in PPO. Ageing seemingly diminishes the adaptive CRF responses to exercise training in individuals with SCI.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42018104342Why was this research done?- Individuals with spinal cord injury typically exhibit low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. As such, these individuals are at a higher risk for the development of chronic diseases in comparison to the non-injured population.- The current spinal cord injury-specific exercise guidelines encourage moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise 40 minutes per week for fitness benefits or 90 minutes per week for cardiometabolic health benefits. Yet, others have suggested individuals with spinal cord injury should be achieving 150 minutes per week in line with non-injured population guidelines.- This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to identify whether specific injury characteristics (e.g., time, level or severity of injury) or exercise intervention parameters (e.g., modality, intensity, volume etc.) result in the greatest changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with spinal cord injury.What did the researchers do and find?- We searched for studies that investigated the effects of exercise interventions lasting longer than 2 weeks on changes in absolute and relative peak oxygen consumption and/or peak power output in individuals with spinal cord injury. In total, we included 120 studies of various study designs: 29 randomised controlled trials, 67 pre-post studies, 11 cohort comparisons, 7 cross-sectional studies and 6 observational studies.- The greatest changes in peak power output may be achieved by individuals with acute spinal cord injury or paraplegia. Upper-body aerobic and resistance exercise were identified as the most optimal exercise modalities. Furthermore, prescribing moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise using either a percentage of the individual’s peak heart rate or oxygen consumption, for three or more sessions per week, resulted in the greatest improvements in peak power output.- Our findings support the minimum 40 minutes of weekly moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise recommended by the spinal cord injury-specific exercise guidelines to significantly improve fitness. However, while not statistically significant, a two-fold greater improvement in peak power output was shown for interventions with exercise performed ≥90 min/week in comparison to ≥40 min/week. Cross-sectional comparisons also revealed that individuals with spinal cord injury performing higher levels of physical activity were associated with higher cardiorespiratory fitness.What do these findings mean?- Exercise interventions >2 weeks can significantly improve cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with a spinal cord injury by a clinically meaningful change greater than one spinal cord injury adjusted metabolic equivalent (i.e., ≥2.7 mL/kg/min). A one metabolic equivalent improvement has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular related mortality risk in non-injured individuals.- Our findings indicate that certain participant/injury characteristics and exercise intervention parameters are moderators of the changes observed in cardiorespiratory fitness across studies. These factors should be considered in the design of future exercise interventions. Future research should consider: following spinal cord injury-specific reporting guidelines (ensuring transparency of reporting), investigating the dose-response relationship between exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness or influence of exercise intensity in this population, and consider how different injury characteristics impact the benefits of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness.- The main limitation of the study was the lack of randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing changes in CRF following an exercise intervention relative to a control group. This prevented subgroup comparisons in this study design specifically and therefore we pooled pre-post and RCT exercise interventions to explore these effects.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=104342) Funding StatementThis work was supported by a Nathalie Rose Barr PhD studentship awarded by the International Spinal Research Trust (#NRB123 to DDH), a Flexible and Enhanced Learning Program at the the Faculty of Medicine within the University of British Columbia (to GSB), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant to CL), the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione Grant PZ00P3_186101 to CRJ), the Wings for Life Research Foundation (2020_118 to CRJ), and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Trainee Awards in conjunction with the International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries and Rick Hansen Foundation, respectively (17110 to MW; 17767 to TEN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscriptAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll code/scripts and data used for the analysis are available at https://github.com/jutzca/Exercise-and-fitness-in-SCI https://github.com/jutzca/Exercise-and-fitness-in-SCI