RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Accuracy and Precision of Multiple Laboratory and Field Methods to The Criterion <em>In Vivo</em> Five-Compartment Body Composition Model and Their Association with Muscle Strength in Collegiate Athletes of Varying States of Hydration: The <em>Da Kine</em> Protocol Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.30.23290630
DO 10.1101/2023.05.30.23290630
A1 Cataldi, Devon
A1 Bennett, Jonathan P.
A1 Wong, Michael C.
A1 Quon, Brandon K.
A1 Liu, Yong En
A1 Kelly, Nisa
A1 Kelly, Thomas
A1 Schoeller, Dale A.
A1 Heymsfield, Steven B.
A1 Shepherd, John A.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2023.05.30.23290630.abstract
AB Objective To compare multiple body composition analysis methods in athletes with varying states of hydration to the criterion 5-compartment model(5CM) of body composition and assess the relationships of technique-specific estimates of fat and fat-free mass(FM, FFM) to muscle strength.Methods Body composition was assessed in 80(40-female) athletes with a mean age of 21.8±4.2 years. All athletes underwent laboratory-based methods: air-displacement plethysmography(ADP), deuterium-oxide dilution(D2O), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA), underwater-weighing(UWW), and field-based: 3D-optical(3DO) imaging, and three bioelectrical impedance(BIA) devices(S10/SFB7/SOZO). Participants’ muscular strength was assessed by isokinetic/isometric dynamometry. Accuracy was assessed by Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient(CCC) and precision by root-mean-square coefficient of variation(RMS-CV%).Results Athletes’ hydration status(total body water/FFM) was significantly(p&lt;0.05) outside of the normal range in both males(0.63-0.73%) and females(0.58-0.78%). The most accurate techniques(ADP/DXA) showed moderate-substantial agreement(CCC=0.90-0.95) in FM and FFM, whereas all field assessments had poor agreement(CCC&lt;0.90), except 3DO FFM in females(CCC=0.91). All measures of FFM produced excellent &lt;1.0% precision, whereas FM from ADP, DXA, D2O, S10, and UWW had &lt;2.0%. The associations between muscle strength and the various devices’ FFM estimates differed. However, more accurate body composition compared to the criterion produced a better determination of muscle strength by significant quartile p-trends(p&lt;0.001). The 5CM exhibits the highest determination for all categories of muscle strength which persisted across all hydration measures.Conclusion To optimize accuracy in assessing body composition and muscle strength, researchers and clinicians should prioritize selecting devices based on their accuracy compared to the 5CM. Reliable approaches such as ADP and DXA yield accurate and precise body composition estimates and thereby, better strength assessments, regardless of hydration status. Future athlete studies should investigate the impact of changes in FFM on functional measures compared to the criterion method.Summary Box This study compared various body composition analysis methods in athletes with varying states of hydration to the criterion 5-compartment model(5CM) and assessed their relationship to muscle strength. The results showed that accurate and precise estimates of body composition can be determined in athletes, and a more accurate body composition measurement produced better strength estimates. The best laboratory-based techniques were air displacement plethysmography(ADP) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry(DXA), while field assessments had moderate-poor agreement. Prioritize accurate body composition assessment devices compared to the 5CM for better strength estimates in athletes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Hologic Inc. grant # 2018-01102.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee/IRB of the University of Hawaii gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://shepherdresearchlab.org/ 3DO3-dimensional opticalBIAbioelectrical impedance analysisD2OdeuteriumTBWtotal body waterDXAdual-energy X-ray absorptiometryBMCbone mineral contentADPair displacement plethysmographyBVbody volumeBMbody massMoosseous mineralMssoft tissue mineralFFMfat-free massFMfat masskgkilogramLliterNHOPINative Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderNHnon-HispanicSDstandard deviationCCCLin’s concordance correlation coefficientRMSEroot mean square error, root-mean-square coefficient of variation(RMS-CV%)