PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rahman Jabin, Md Shafiqur
AU  - Pan, Ding
AU  - Nilsson, Evalill
TI  - Characterizing patient details-related challenges from health information technology-related incident reports from Swedish healthcare
AID  - 10.1101/2023.05.30.23290728
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.05.30.23290728
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2023.05.30.23290728.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2023.05.30.23290728.full
AB  - This study examined health information technology-related (HIT) incidents to identify patient details-related issues, their association with contributing factors, and outcomes. Sources of information comprised retrospectively collected incident reports (n=95) using two sampling methods, i.e., purposive and snowball sampling. The reports were collected in two formats – interviews (written and telephone) and/or a set of already existing reports from the local database. The incident reports were analyzed using both the inductive method (thematic analysis) and the deductive approach using an existing framework, i.e., the International Classification for Patient Safety. The studies identified 90 incidents with 120 patient details-related issues—categorized as either information-related (48%) or documentation-related (52%) problems; around two-thirds of the 120 issues were characterized by human factors. Of the total sample, 87 contributing factors were identified, of which “medical device/system” (45%) and “documentation” (20%) were the most common contributing factors. Of 90 incidents, more than half (59%) comprised patient-related outcomes—patient inconvenience (47%) and patient harm (12%) and the remaining 41% (n=37) included staff or organization-related outcomes. The study confirms that patient details-related problems with HIT systems were more likely to affect patient care delivery – more than half of the incidents resulted in patient-related outcomes, namely patient inconvenience and patient harm, including disease risks, severe health deterioration, injury, and even patient death. Incidents associated with patient details can cause deleterious effects; therefore, characterizing them should be a routine part of clinical practice to improve the constantly changing healthcare system.Author Summary The rapid advances in HIT systems have made healthcare a truly complex socio-technical system than ever before. No matter what changes are introduced in healthcare, new, unforeseen problems always arise. Our research focuses on improving the already existing HIT systems and the care delivery around those systems by solving the clinical problems we encounter in our day-to-day clinical practice rather than building new technologies. The foundation builds on collecting and analyzing incident reports to illuminate the current challenges of Swedish digital healthcare systems and provide a basis for preventive and corrective strategies, thus improving clinical practice. Although a host of mainly technical problems was expected, around two-thirds of the issues were identified to be generated by failures due to human factors. Therefore, several strategies to mitigate these risks can be implemented, such as training healthcare professionals before integrating new HIT systems and designing out the “error-prone features”. Our study provided insight into patient information/documentation-related problems associated with HIT systems and how human and technical factors affect patient care delivery. The analyses may also help the reporters and analysts regarding where preventive and corrective strategies should be addressed to improve the constantly changing healthcare system.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical advice (Dnr 701-2021) was received from the Ethical Advisory Board in South East Sweden on 4th March 2021, prior to this study. No personal or sensitive information was collected. The datasets of incident reports were filtered to deidentify any personal or sensitive information by the respective management before providing them to us. The feedback from the committee was: The ethics committee SouthEast has taken note of this application for the planned study. The committee sees no ethical difficulties with it being carried out as planned student work with registration and/or publication in DIVA.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesWe wish we could share the data. Unfortunately, we cannot share this data since we do not have permission to do so. However, we would sincerely request you grant us the exemption of data availability