RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reliability of force plate-based measures of standing balance in the sub-acute stage of post-stroke recovery
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.18.23290052
DO 10.1101/2023.05.18.23290052
A1 Aryan, Raabeae
A1 Inness, Elizabeth
A1 Patterson, Kara K.
A1 Mochizuki, George
A1 Mansfield, Avril
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/24/2023.05.18.23290052.abstract
AB Background Difficulty controlling balance is one of the major contributors to the increased risk of falls among individuals with stroke. It is important to use reliable and objective measures to evaluate balance impairments post-stroke to inform more effective post-stroke rehabilitation.Objectives To examine the relative and absolute reliabilities of force plate-based balance measures in quiet standing, in the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery.Methods Twenty-four people with sub-acute stroke (mean age=61 years) performed two trials of quiet standing, each 30 seconds long. Sixteen force plate-based balance measures in the time, frequency, or nonlinear domains were calculated. Within-session test-retest reliabilities were investigated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change.Results Mean speed of displacements of the centre of pressure along the anterior-posterior axis (ICC=0.91; CI95%=[0.83, 0.95]), and directional weight-bearing asymmetry (ICC=0.91; CI95%=[0.82, 0.95]) demonstrated high relative reliabilities, followed by the speed-based symmetry index and absolute weight-bearing asymmetry (both ICCs=0.86; CI95%=[0.74, 0.93]).Conclusions Mean speeds of centre of pressure, directional weight-bearing asymmetry, and speed-based symmetry index are the most reliable measures that can be included in the balance assessments of individuals within the sub-acute stage of post-stroke recovery. These findings can better inform clinicians about the specific balance problems experienced by people in this population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEquipment and space have been funded with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Innovation Trust, and the Ministry of Research and Innovation. Avril Mansfield was supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Raabeae Aryan was supported by the Peterborough K.M. Hunter Charitable Foundation Graduate Award, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Student Scholarship, QEII/Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology, Unilever/Lipton Graduate Fellowships in Neurosciences, and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute-University of Toronto Doctoral Completion Award. The authors confirm that the funders had no influence over the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Research Ethics Board of the University Health Network gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly; therefore, supporting/raw data is not available.