RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prevention of post-concussion-like symptoms in emergency room patients: Results from a two-center randomized controlled study comparing an early single-session Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing intervention with usual care
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.11.23289838
DO 10.1101/2023.05.11.23289838
A1 Gil-Jardiné, Cédric
A1 Al Joboory, Samantha
A1 Saint Jammes, Juliane Tortes
A1 Durand, Guillaume
A1 Brunschwig, Romain
A1 Catoire, Pierre
A1 Tellier, Éric
A1 Ribéreau-Gayon, Régis
A1 Galinski, Michel
A1 Salmi, Louis-Rachid
A1 Revel, Philippe
A1 Valdenaire, Guillaume
A1 Tazarourte, Karim
A1 Lagarde, Emmanuel
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/16/2023.05.11.23289838.abstract
AB Importance After a traumatic event, 10–20% of injured patients will suffer for several months from various symptoms, collectively termed post-concussion-like symptoms (PCLS), which can lead to a decline in quality of life. Moreover, recent findings suggested that this condition may also apply to patients with an acute medical condition. A preliminary randomized controlled trial suggested that this condition may be prevented by a single early short Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) psychotherapeutic session delivered at the ER.Objective The present study was designed to compare the impact of the early EMDR intervention versus usual care on 3-month PCLS in patients presenting at the ER. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was an open-label two-center comparative randomized controlled trial with phone follow-up assessments at 3 months. Eligible participants included adults (≥18 years old) presenting at the ER who have a high risk of PCLS using a 3-item scoring scale.Interventions The randomization groups were as follows: (i) EMDR Recent Traumatic Episode Protocol (R-TEP) intervention performed during the ER stay and (ii) usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and secondary outcomes were respectively the frequency of PCLS and PTSD at 3 months after the ER visit.Results This study included 313 patients with a high risk of PCLS who were randomized into two groups; of these patients, 219 were contacted by phone at 3 months. There was no difference in the primary outcome (EMDR: 53.8% vs. Control: 49.6%), but for the secondary outcome, the occurrence of PTSD was greater in the intervention group (9.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.04). In the EMDR group, a high level of self-assessed stress at admission (>6) was strongly associated with persistent PCLS (76.9% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.04).Conclusion and Relevance The present results showed that a single EMDR R-TEP session did not reduce the incidence of PCLS at 3 months in patients admitted to the ER. However, the rate of PTSD was higher in the EMDR group. These results suggest that more data should be collected to define which treatment options may be offered to patients attending the ER and the role that psychologist skill plays in this process.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03400813.Question Does early EMDR in the emergency room reduce the incidence of PCLS at 3 months after care?Findings In patients admitted to the ER, a single EMDR R-TEP session did not reduce the incidence of PCLS at 3 months, especially among patients who reported a high level of stress at admission.Meaning The present results suggest that more data will be necessary to determine the available treatment options for patients attending the ER and the role that psychologist skill plays in this process.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03400813Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research project received a positive endorsement from the French Comite de Protection de Personnes (CPP), Ouest II Angers Number RCB = 2017 A01462 51 N CPP = 2017/36.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors