PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Gus, Patrícia Ioschpe AU - de Maman, Raquel Silveira AU - Lengler, Arthur Dementshuk AU - Martins, Antônia Stumpf AU - Torres Arteche, Maria Antônia AU - Pieta, Marina Puerari AU - Leivas, Gabriel AU - Carloto, Rafael AU - Marinho, Diane AU - Tartarella, Márcia Beatriz AU - Pakter, Helena AU - Fabris, Caroline AU - Castro, Terla AU - Kronbauer, Fernando AU - Colossi, Carina AU - Jong, Monica AU - Resnikoff, Serge TI - PREVALENCE OF MYOPIA AMONG PUBLIC SCHOOL CHILDREN IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL AID - 10.1101/2023.05.12.23289894 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.05.12.23289894 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/16/2023.05.12.23289894.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/16/2023.05.12.23289894.full AB - Purpose Myopia has been considered a public health issue by the World Health Organization since 2015. The growing incidence of myopia worldwide, called the myopia epidemic, and its potential blinding complications in adulthood like cataract, glaucoma, retinal detachment and maculopathy, have been extensively published and discussed in peer review papers. Nonetheless, little information about Latin America is available. This study aims to detect the prevalence of myopia in southern Brazil, the biggest country of South America.Methods A prospective cross sectional study recruited 330 public school children between 2019 and 2021, aged 5 to 20 years old. All children underwent a comprehensive eye examination and detailed lifestyle questionnaire. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Kruskal Wallys and the Chi-Square Test were used to assess simple correlations and associations between myopia and medical conditions, use of medications, ophthalmic history and family history of ocular conditions, besides demographics and lifestyle focused on screen time/day. Associations between the results of the ophthalmologic evaluation and all factors included in the questionnaire were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equation model (GEE). The prevalence of hyperopia and astigmatism were also assessed.Results Total prevalence of myopia was 17.4% (CI 13.8 – 21.7%). Low myopia (-0.50D to -5.75D) comprised 15.2% (CI 11.9 – 19.3%) and high myopia (-6,00D or worse) was 2.1% (CI 1.1 – 4.1%). Relative risk of myopia for females was 1.6 (CI 1.00 – 2.57%) and each additional hour of screen time increased a child’s chance of having myopia by 6.5%. The prevalence of hyperopia was 7,7% (CI 5.4 -10.9%) and of astigmatism, either myopic or hyperopic, was 25.6% (CI 21.4 – 30.2%).Conclusions Brazil has always been considered a hyperopic country. These are the highest reported prevalences of myopia under cycloplegia and the first paper to present myopia as a more prevalent refractive error than hyperopia among Brazilian school children to date.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this workAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Ethics Committee approved this study, which adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Guardians of the children provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.