RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Discordance Between Self-Reported and Lab-Measured A1C Among U.S. Adults with Diabetes: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.10.23289782
DO 10.1101/2023.05.10.23289782
A1 Kamath, Aneesh
A1 Imes, Christopher C.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/10/2023.05.10.23289782.abstract
AB Aims To: 1) compare characteristics of those who report knowing their hemoglobin A1C (A1C) value versus those who do not; 2) determine the correlation and concordance between self-reported and lab-measured A1C; and 3) examine factors associated with a lab-measured A1C of ≤ 7%.Methods This was a cross-sectional secondary data analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2013-2020. Participants ≥ 20 years old who reported receiving a diabetes diagnosis were included.Results After proper sample weighting, twenty-two percent of participants reported not knowing their A1C value. Not knowing one’s A1C value was associated with identifying as a racial or ethnic group other than White, having a lower income, and having less formal education (P values < 0.5). Self-reported A1C was moderately correlated with lab-measured A1C (r = 0.62, P < 0.001). Higher self-reported A1C and identifying as Black or Mexican American were associated with lower odds of good glycemic control.Conclusions Many patients with diabetes did not know their A1C, and among those that did, the value was often inaccurate. Even when patients knew their A1C, the correlation between self-reported and lab-measured A1C was only moderate. Clinicians should evaluate and, if needed, enhance patient knowledge of A1C.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not recieve any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We only used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) a publically available dataset.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data used in this study can be obtained at the NHANES website. Only NHANES data were used in this study. Upon contacting the authors, the files used for analyses can be provided.