RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimated Effects of Amyloid Reduction on Cognitive Change: A Bayesian Update across a Range of Priors
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.28.23289223
DO 10.1101/2023.04.28.23289223
A1 Ackley, Sarah F.
A1 Wang, Jingxuan
A1 Chen, Ruijia
A1 Power, Melinda C.
A1 Allen, Isabel Elaine
A1 Glymour, M. Maria
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/03/2023.04.28.23289223.abstract
AB Introduction Results of the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I and II trials rekindled discussion on the impact of amyloid-targeting drugs. We use a Bayesian approach to quantify how a rational observer would have updated their prior beliefs based on new trial results.Methods We used publicly available data from the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I & II trials to estimate the effect of reducing amyloid on CDR-SB score. A range of prior positions were then updated according to Bayes Theorem using these estimates.Results After updating with new trial data, a wide range of starting positions resulted in credible intervals that did not include no effect of amyloid reduction on CDR-SB.Discussion For a range of starting beliefs and assuming veracity of underlying data, rational observers would conclude there is a small benefit of amyloid-reductions on cognition. This benefit must be weighed against opportunity cost and side effect risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of Aging (NIA) under award numbers R01AG057869 (MMG, MCP), K99AG073454 (SFA), and K00AG068431 (RC). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used ONLY openly available summary statistics.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. https://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/gantenerumab-mystery-how-did-it-lose-potency-phase-3 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948