RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Acute pharmacodynamic responses to exenatide: Drug-induced increases in insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.15.23287166
DO 10.1101/2023.03.15.23287166
A1 Taylor, Simeon I.
A1 Montasser, May E.
A1 Yuen, Ashley H.
A1 Fan, Hubert
A1 Yazdi, Zhinoosossadat Shahidzadeh
A1 Whitlatch, Hilary B.
A1 Mitchell, Braxton D.
A1 Shuldiner, Alan R.
A1 Muniyappa, Ranganath
A1 Streeten, Elizabeth A.
A1 Beitelshees, Amber L.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/03/2023.03.15.23287166.abstract
AB Background GLP1R agonists provide multiple benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes – including improved glycemic control, weight loss, and decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Because drug responses vary among individuals, we initiated investigations to identify genetic variants associated with the magnitude of drug responses.Methods Exenatide (5 µg, sc) or saline (0.2 mL, sc) was administered to 62 healthy volunteers. Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests were conducted to assess the impact of exenatide on insulin secretion and insulin action. This pilot study was designed as a crossover study in which participants received exenatide and saline in random order.Results Exenatide increased first phase insulin secretion 1.9-fold (p=1.9×10-9) and accelerated the rate of glucose disappearance 2.4-fold (p=2×10-10). Minimal model analysis demonstrated that exenatide increased glucose effectiveness (Sg) by 32% (p=0.0008) but did not significantly affect insulin sensitivity (Si). The exenatide-induced increase in insulin secretion made the largest contribution to inter-individual variation in exenatide-induced acceleration of glucose disappearance while inter-individual variation in the drug effect on Sg contributed to a lesser extent (β=0.58 or 0.27, respectively).Conclusions This pilot study provides validation for the value of an FSIGT (including minimal model analysis) to provide primary data for our ongoing pharmacogenomic study of pharmacodynamic effects of semaglutide (NCT05071898). Three endpoints provide quantitative assessments of GLP1R agonists’ effects on glucose metabolism: first phase insulin secretion, glucose disappearance rates, and glucose effectiveness.Registration NCT02462421 (clinicaltrials.gov)Funding American Diabetes Association (1-16-ICTS-112); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (R01DK130238, T32DK098107, P30DK072488)Competing Interest StatementSIT serves as a consultant for Ionis Pharmaceuticals and receives an inventors share of royalties from NIDDK for metreleptin as a treatment for generalized lipodystrophy. ARS is an employee of Regeneron Genetics Center. BDM and MEM receive grant support from Regeneron Genetics Center. BDM, MEM, EAS, and HBW have received partial salary support from funds provided by RGC. ALB, ZSY, RM, and HF declare no competing interests.Clinical TrialNCT05762744Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05762744?term=NCT05762744&draw=2&rank=1 Funding StatementAmerican Diabetes Association (1-16-ICTS-112) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (R01DK130238, T32DK098107, and P30DK072488)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Maryland Baltimore IRBI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData is available to qualified academic researchers subject to a data transfer agreement to protect participants' confidential information.