RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimation of Near-kink Reproduction Numbers During the Emergent Variants of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Log-quadratic and Forward-imputation Approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.24.23289029
DO 10.1101/2023.04.24.23289029
A1 Nakamoto, Ichiro
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/26/2023.04.24.23289029.abstract
AB Background Sketching the major portraits of the COVID-19 epidemic when variants of the pathogen emerge is critical to inform the dynamics of disease transmission, reproduction (i.e., the average counts of individuals of secondary infections generated by an index individual infected by the virus) strength of the pathogen, and countermeasure strategies. Multiple approaches, including log-linear, EpiEstim (an R package generally utilized to estimate the evolution traits of epidemics), and near-log-linear techniques, have been exploited to evaluate the principal parameters such as basic and effective reproduction numbers of an epidemic outbreak.Objective This study focuses on the kink corner (i.e., sharp alternation of direction of the transmission curve) presenting differentiated log-quadratic traits where more infectious variants of viruses emerge at the diminishing transmission phase of an infectious disease.Methods A novel log-quadratic trending framework was proposed to project potentially unidentified cases (i.e., forward imputing approximately one week ahead) of COVID-19 around the kink, where the transmission of the pandemic initially lowered and accelerated subsequently, and exercised with the updated framework of classic EpiEstim and Log-linear model. I first compared the performance near the kink using the proposed technique versus the two traditional models taking into account a variety of levels of transmissibility, data distribution (Weibull, Gamma, and Lognormal distributions), and reporting rates (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 respectively). Thereafter I utilized the revised framework on the outbreak data of four settings including Bulgaria, Japan, Poland, and South Korea from June to August 2022.Results The proposed framework reduced the estimation bias versus traditional EpiEstim and log-linear methods near the kink. The coverage estimates of 95% confidence intervals improved. The proposed forward-imputation method implied generally a consistent ascending trend of effective reproduction number estimation applying to a precipitous transition from diminishing to diverging scenarios versus the irregular zigzagging outcomes in classic methods when more contagious variants of the virus were present in the absence of effective vaccines.Conclusions The log-quadratic correction accounting for transmissibility, data distribution, reporting rates, sliding windows, and generation intervals improved the basic and effective reproduction numbers estimation at the kink corner versus the classic EpiEstim and log-linear models by refined amendment of curve fitting. This is of concern when essentially the fundamental transmission traits of a pandemic alter expeditiously and countermeasures are needed at the earlier variant phases of the transiting climax with the advancement of the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesSupplementary materials are available online. The posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. The R codes to reproduce this analysis are available upon correspondence.