PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Loeb, Anisha M. AU - Pattwell, Siobhan S. AU - Meshinchi, Soheil AU - Bedalov, Antonio AU - Loeb, Keith R. TI - Donor Bone Marrow Derived Macrophage Engraftment into the Central Nervous System of Allogeneic Transplant Patients AID - 10.1101/2023.04.20.23288326 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.04.20.23288326 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/25/2023.04.20.23288326.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/25/2023.04.20.23288326.full AB - Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a well known treatment of hematologic malignancies wherein nascent stem cells provide a regenerating marrow and immunotherapy against the tumor. The progeny of hematopoietic stem cells also populate a wide spectrum of tissues, including the brain, as bone marrow derived macrophages similar to microglial cells. We developed a sensitive and novel combined IHC and XY FISH assay to detect, quantify and characterize donor cells in the cerebral cortex of 19 female allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. We show that the number of male donor cells ranged from 0.14-3.0% of total cells or 1.2-25% of microglial cells. Using tyramide based fluorescent IHC we found at least 80% of the donor cells express the microglial marker Iba1 consistent with being bone marrow derived macrophages. The percentage of donor cells was related to pretransplant conditioning; donor cells from radiation based myeloablative cases averaged 8.1% of microglial cells, while those from non-myeloablative cases averaged only 1.3%. The number of donor cells in patients conditioned with Busulfan or Treosulfan based myeloablation were similar to TBI based conditioning; donor cells averaged 6.8% of microglial cells. Notably, patients who received multiple transplants and those with the longest post-transplant survival had the highest level of donor engraftment, with donor cells averaging 16.3% of microglial cells. Our work represents the largest study characterizing bone marrow-derived macrophages in post-transplant patients. The efficiency of engraftment observed in our study warrants future research on microglial replacement as a therapeutic option for disorders of the central nervous system.Key PointsWe developed a sensitive Iba1 IHC and XY FISH co-stain assay to detect bone marrow derived donor cells in the brain of HSCT patients.Donor cells in the CNS express Iba1 and average 8% of microglia after myeloablative HSCT; double transplants increase engraftment up to 25%.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by grants from 1. Core Center of Excellence in Hematology Grant (SSP +KRL), Seattle Translational Tumor Research (STTR) Data Generation and Bioinformatics Grant (KRL) 2. Rett Syndrome Research Trust (AB). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All specimens used in this study were obtained after written consent from patients and approval by the Fred Hutch Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (protocol #1837). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors