RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Codes for Congenital Heart Defects (CHD) Have Variable and Limited Accuracy for Detecting CHD Cases
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.20.23288898
DO 10.1101/2023.04.20.23288898
A1 Ivey, Lindsey C.
A1 Rodriguez, Fred H.
A1 Shi, Haoming
A1 Chong, Cohen
A1 Chen, Joy
A1 Raskind-Hood, Cheryl
A1 Downing, Karrie F.
A1 Farr, Sherry L.
A1 Book, Wendy M.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/24/2023.04.20.23288898.abstract
AB Background Administrative data permits analysis of large cohorts but relies on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD) codes that may not reflect true congenital heart defects (CHD).Methods 1497 cases with at least one encounter between 1/1/2010 – 12/31/2019 in two healthcare systems (one adult, one pediatric) identified by at least one of 87 ICD CHD codes were validated through chart review for the presence of CHD and CHD anatomic group.Results Inter- and intra-observer reliability averaged > 95%. Positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD codes for CHD was 68.1% (1020/1497) overall, 94.6% (123/130) for cases identified in both healthcare systems, 95.8% (249/260) for severe codes, 52.6% (370/703) for shunt codes, 75.9% (243/320) for valve codes, 73.5% (119/162) for shunt and valve codes, and 75.0% (39/52) for “Other CHD” (7 ICD codes). PPV for cases with >1 unique CHD code was 85.4% (503/589) vs. 56.3% (498/884) for one CHD code. Of cases with secundum atrial septal defect ICD codes 745.5/Q21.1 in isolation, 30.9% (123/398) had a confirmed CHD. Patent foramen ovale was present in 66.2% (316/477) of false positives (FP). The median number of unique CHD-coded encounters was higher for true positives (TP) than FP (2.0; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-3.0 vs 1.0; IQR:1.0-1.0, respectively, p<0.0001). TP had younger mean age at first encounter with a CHD code than FP (22.4 years vs 26.3 years, p=0.0017).Conclusion PPV of CHD ICD codes varies by characteristics for detection of CHD by ICD code and anatomic grouping. While an ICD code for severe CHD and/or the presence of a case in more than one data source, regardless of anatomic group, is associated with higher PPV for CHD, most TP cases did not have these characteristics. The development of algorithms to improve accuracy may improve administrative data for CHD surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work was funded by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement, DD19-1902Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Emory University IRB approved study. Details are included in methodsI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data set contains PHI and cannot be shared publicly. The analysis has been replicated.