RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A rapid review of the effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of surgical hubs in supporting planned care activity
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.20.23288815
DO 10.1101/2023.04.20.23288815
A1 Okolie, Chukwudi
A1 Everitt, Jordan
A1 Wale, Alesha
A1 Morgan, Helen
A1 Ayres, Toby
A1 Shaw, Hannah
A1 Lewis, Ruth
A1 Cooper, Alison
A1 Edwards, Adrian
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/20/2023.04.20.23288815.abstract
AB The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated disruptions to elective care services in the UK, leading to longer waits for treatment and a growing elective surgery backlog. There have been growing calls for the creation of surgical hubs to help reduce this backlog. Surgical hubs aim to increase surgical capacity by providing quicker access to procedures, as well as facilitate infection control by segregating patients and staff from emergency care. This rapid review aimed to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of surgical hubs in supporting planned care activity, to inform the implementation of these hubs in Wales.The review identified evidence available up until January 2023. Twelve primary studies were included, eight of which used comparative methods. Most of the studies were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and described surgical hubs designed mainly to mitigate the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Outcome measures reported included clinical, performance, economic, and patient reported outcomes across a variety of different surgical disciplines. Most of the studies did not describe surgical hubs based on their structure, i.e., standalone, integrated, or ring-fenced hubs.The evidence relating to the impact of surgical hubs on clinical outcomes appeared to be heterogenous and limited. Included studies did not appear to control for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes. Evidence of the impact of surgical hubs on performance outcomes such as efficiency, utilisation/usage, volume of surgeries/treatments, performance, cancellations, and time from diagnosis to treatment is limited. Evidence relating to the economic impact of surgical hubs is also limited, however there is evidence to suggest that total average costs are lower in surgical hubs when compared to general hospitals. Evidence relating to the impact of surgical hubs on patient reported outcomes is limited but indicates there may be a positive effect on patient satisfaction and compliance.Considerable variation in the types of surgical hubs reviewed, surgical disciplines, along with the small number of comparative studies, as well as methodological limitations across included studies, could limit the applicability of these findings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Evidence Service, Public Health Wales was funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAcronymFull DescriptionACLAnterior Cruciate LigamentAHTAcute Hospital TrustASAAmerican Society of AnaesthesiologistsBPHBUPA Cromwell HospitalCNDCataract National DatasetCIonfidence IntervalCOVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019CPGClinical Prioritisation GroupCRSColorectal SurgeryCTSCataract, and Carpal Tunnel SurgeriesDRGDiagnostic-Related Group SystemERPEnhanced Recovery ProtocolsGOGynaecological OncologyISTCIndependent Sector Treatment CentresITCIndependent Treatment CentresJBIJoanna Briggs InstituteMRSAMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus AureusNHSNational Health ServiceNPSNet Promoter ScoreOROdds RatioOSHOncological Surgical HubPbRPayment by ResultsPESUProtected Elective Surgical UnitsPPWPre-Pandemic WardPROMPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRMHRoyal Marsden HospitalRRRapid ReviewSARS-CoV-2Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2THRTotal Hip ReplacementTKRTotal Knee ReplacementUKUnited KingdomUKSHUK Specialist Hospitals