RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Tool for Low-Cost, Quantitative Assessment of Shoulder Function Using Machine Learning
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.14.23288613
DO 10.1101/2023.04.14.23288613
A1 Darevsky, David M.
A1 Hu, Daniel A.
A1 Gomez, Francisco A.
A1 Davies, Michael R.
A1 Liu, Xuhui
A1 Feeley, Brian T.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/17/2023.04.14.23288613.abstract
AB Tears within the stabilizing muscles of the shoulder, known as the rotator cuff (RC), are the most common cause of shoulder pain—often presenting in older patients and requiring expensive, advanced imaging for diagnosis1–4. Despite the high prevalence of RC tears within the elderly population, there are no accessible and low-cost methods to assess shoulder function which can eschew the barrier of an in-person physical exam or imaging study. Here we show that a simple string pulling behavior task, where subjects pull a string using hand-over-hand motions, provides a reliable readout of shoulder health across animals and humans. We find that both mice and humans with RC tears exhibit decreased movement amplitude, prolonged movement time, and quantitative changes in waveform shape during string pulling task performance. In rodents, we further note the degradation of low dimensional, temporally coordinated movements after injury. Furthermore, a predictive model built on our biomarker ensemble succeeds in classifying human patients as having a RC tear with >90% accuracy. Our results demonstrate how a combined framework bridging task kinematics, machine learning, and algorithmic assessment of movement quality enables future development of smartphone-based, at-home diagnostic tests for shoulder injury.Competing Interest StatementD.M.D., M.R.D., X.L., and B.T.F have submitted a provisional patent application that includes the findings reported here.Funding StatementThis work is supported by NIH 1 F31 NS127514-01 to D.D. and NIH 1R01AR072669, VA BLRD 1IO1BX002680 grants to B.T.F. and X.L.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study protocol as approved by the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research and all procedures were approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data and custom code that support the rodent findings in this study are available from the Senior Author (Brian T. Feeley, brian.feeley@ucsf.edu) upon reasonable request. Human subjects data is not available for distribution because study participants did not consent to such sharing.