RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Metagenomics reveals novel microbial signatures of farm exposures in house dust
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.07.23288301
DO 10.1101/2023.04.07.23288301
A1 Wang, Ziyue
A1 Dalton, Kathryn R.
A1 Lee, Mikyeong
A1 Parks, Christine G.
A1 Beane Freeman, Laura E.
A1 Zhu, Qiyun
A1 González, Antonio
A1 Knight, Rob
A1 Zhao, Shanshan
A1 Motsinger-Reif, Alison A
A1 London, Stephanie J.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/12/2023.04.07.23288301.abstract
AB Indoor home dust microbial communities, important contributors to human health outcomes, are shaped by environmental factors, including farm-related exposures. Detection and characterization of microbiota are influenced by sequencing methodology; however, it is unknown if advanced metagenomic whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) can detect novel associations between environmental exposures and the indoor built-environment dust microbiome, compared to conventional 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (16S). This study aimed to better depict indoor dust microbial communities using WGS to investigate novel associations with environmental risk factors from the homes of 781 farmers and farm spouses enrolled in the Agricultural Lung Health Study. We examined various farm-related exposures, including living on a farm, crop versus animal production, and type of animal production, as well as non-farm exposures, including home cleanliness and indoor pets. We assessed the association of the exposures on within-sample alpha diversity and between-sample beta diversity, and the differential abundance of specific microbes by exposure. Results were compared to previous findings using 16S. We found most farm exposures were significantly positively associated with both alpha and beta diversity. Many microbes exhibited differential abundance related to farm exposures, mainly in the phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. The identification of novel differential taxa associated with farming at the genera level, including Rhodococcus, Bifidobacterium, Corynebacterium, and Pseudomonas, was a benefit of WGS compared to 16S. Our findings indicate that characterization of dust microbiota, an important component of the indoor environment relevant to human health, is heavily influenced by sequencing techniques. WGS is a powerful tool to survey the microbial community that provides novel insights on the impact of environmental exposures on indoor dust microbiota, and should be an important consideration in designing future studies in environmental health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (Z01-ES049030 and Z01-ES102385), the National Cancer Institute (Z01-CP010119B), and by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences gave ethical approval for this work. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe raw sequencing data presented in this study are stored in online platform Qiita. Contact the corresponding author for permission for the raw sequence data and metadata.