PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Entwistle, Amy AU - Walker, Susan AU - Knecht, Anne AU - Strum, Susan L. AU - Shah, Asad AU - Podgoreanu, Mihai V. AU - Pustavoitau, Aliaksei AU - Mitin, Natalia AU - Williams, Judson B. TI - A signature of pre-operative biomarkers of cellular senescence to predict risk of cardiac and kidney adverse events after cardiac surgery AID - 10.1101/2023.04.03.23288081 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.04.03.23288081 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/11/2023.04.03.23288081.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/11/2023.04.03.23288081.full AB - Objective Understand the potential for pre-operative biomarkers of cellular senescence, a primary aging mechanism, to predict risk of cardiac surgery-associated adverse events.Methods Biomarkers of senescence were assessed in blood samples collected prior to surgery in 331 patients undergoing CABG +/-valve repair or replacement. Patients were followed throughout the hospital stay and at a 30-day follow-up visit. Logistic regression models for pre-operative risk prediction were built for age-related clinical outcomes with high incidence including KDIGO-defined acute kidney injury (AKI), decline in eGFR ≥25% between pre-op and 30 days, and MACKE30, a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac and kidney events at 30d.Results AKI occurred in 19.9% of patients, persistent decline in kidney function at 30d occurred in 11.0%, and MACKE30 occurred in 13.4%. A network of six biomarkers of senescence (p16, p14, LAG3, CD244, CD28 and suPAR) were able to identify patients at risk for AKI (AUC 0.76), kidney decline at 30d (AUC 0.73), and MACKE30 (AUC 0.71). Comparing the top and bottom tertiles of senescence-based risk models, patients in the top tertile had 7.8 (3.3-8.4) higher odds of developing AKI, 4.5 (1.6-12.6) higher odds of developing renal decline at 30d, and 5.7 (2.1-15.6) higher odds of developing MACKE30. All models remained significant when adjusted for clinical variables. Patients with kidney function decline at 30d were largely non-overlapping and clinically distinct from those who experienced AKI, suggesting a different etiology. Typical clinical factors that predispose to AKI (e.g., age, CKD, surgery type) associated with AKI but not the 30d decline endpoint which was instead associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation.Conclusions A six-member network of biomarkers of senescence, a fundamental mechanism of aging, can identify patients for risk of adverse kidney and cardiac events when measured pre-operatively.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded in part by grants from the NIH/NIA (R43AG050353 and R44AG060888). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design or in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data. The funding sources also had no involvement in the writing of this report or in the decision to submit the report for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, and Central IRB (WIRB/WCG) overseeing WakeMed Health and Hospitals and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesDue to the informed consent and data privacy policies, the clinical data are not publicly available, i.e., accessible for anyone, for any purpose without a review by the Central IRB on a project-by-project basis. Requests for raw data can be made to the corresponding author.