RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Conceptualization, operationalization, and utilization of race and ethnicity in major medical journals 1995-2018: a systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.03.07.22271661
DO 10.1101/2022.03.07.22271661
A1 Martinez, Rae Anne M.
A1 Wilbur, Rachel E.
A1 Andrabi, Nafeesa
A1 Goodwin, Andrea N.
A1 Smith, Natalie R.
A1 Zivich, Paul N.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/07/2022.03.07.22271661.abstract
AB Background Systemic racial and ethnic inequities continue to be perpetuated through scientific methodology and communication norms despite efforts by medical institutions.Purpose To characterize methodological practices regarding race and ethnicity in U.S. research published in leading medical journals.Data source Articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and NEJM from 1995-2018 were sampled via PubMed.Study Selection All original, human subjects research conducted in the U.S.Data Extraction Information on definition, measurement, coding, use in analyses, and justifications was collected.Data Synthesis The proportion of U.S. medical research studies including race and/or ethnicity data increased between 1995 and 2018. No studies defined race or ethnicity. and most did not state how race and/or ethnicity was measured. Common coding schemes included: “Black, other, White,” “Hispanic, Non-Hispanic,” and “Black, Hispanic, other, White.” Race and/or ethnicity was most often used as a control variable, descriptive covariate, or matching criteria. Under 30% of studies included justification for their methodological choices regarding race and/or ethnicity.Conclusions Despite regular efforts by medical journals to implement new policies around race and ethnicity in medical research, pertinent methodological information was systematically absent from the majority of reviewed literature. This stymies critical disciplinary reflection and progress towards equitable practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided through training grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [T32 HD091058] and the Department of Sociology, UNC Chapel Hill. Carolina Population Center provided general support [P2C HD050924, P30 AG066615]. NRS received additional support from the National Cancer Institute [T32 CA057711].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesREDCap data entry form and full list of articles will be made available upon request with publication. Please contact the corresponding author for data inquiries.