RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Integration of serial self-testing for COVID-19 as part of contact tracing in the Brazilian public health system: A pragmatic trial protocol
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.05.23288207
DO 10.1101/2023.04.05.23288207
A1 Green, Rebecca K.
A1 Manchola, Camilo
A1 Gerth-Guyette, Emily
A1 Silva, Michelle Oliveira
A1 Stephanie, Raissa
A1 Santos Soares, Tainá dos
A1 Gottin, Luiza Bastos
A1 Coelho, Milena
A1 Green, Kimberly E.
A1 Costa, Alexandre Dias Tavares
A1 Pereira, Dhélio Batista
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/07/2023.04.05.23288207.abstract
AB Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an unprecedented public health crisis. Insufficient testing continues to limit the effectiveness of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Molecular testing methods such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) continue to be highly centralized and are a sub-optimal option for population surveillance. Rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) offer multiple benefits including low costs, high flexibility to conduct tests in a wide variety of settings, and faster return of results. Recently, self-test Ag-RDTs (STs) have gained approval in several markets and offer the possibility to expand testing, reaching at-risk populations. While STs have the potential to assist the COVID-19 response, test result integrity, reporting, and appropriate linkage to care continue to hinder the widespread implementation of self-testing programs.Methods This protocol presents a mixed-methods pragmatic trial (ISRCTN91602092) to better understand the feasibility of self-testing as part of a contact tracing strategy within the Brazilian public health system. Approximately 604 close contacts of 150 index cases testing positive for COVID-19 will be enrolled. Close contacts will be randomized to either serial (daily) self-testing over a 10-day follow-up period or a more traditional approach to contact tracing with a professional Ag-RDT at one time point post-exposure. Usability workshops and focus group discussions will also be conducted.Discussion This study protocol presents a comprehensive plan to assess the effectiveness, operational feasibility, and stakeholder preferences of a serial self-testing strategy for contact tracing within the Brazilian public health system. Our results will contribute to better understanding of the feasibility of a self-testing strategy within the public sector. Potential risks and limitations are discussed. Our findings will have important implications as governments continue working to mitigate the impact of COVID-19, particularly in the context of where to direct limited resources for testing and healthcare infrastructure.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN91602092Funding StatementThis project is funded by Unitaid (unitaid.org) in collaboration with Population Services International (psi.org) (Award #: 2017-16-PSI-STAR) funding was acquired by KEG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Grant support for the electronic data capture system accessed through a standing collaboration between PATH and the University of Washington is from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1 TR002319.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study with written consent has been approved by The National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP, Brazil’s national Institutional Review Board [IRB], approval number 59179922.9.1001.0011), the local IRBs in Porto Velho and Curitiba, and the WHO Ethics Review Committee.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not Applicable I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableData has not yet been generated or analysed for this study. The analytic dataset from this study will be published when the results are reported upon study completion.