RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Active learning impairments in substance use disorders when resolving the explore-exploit dilemma: A replication and extension of previous computational modeling results
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.03.23288037
DO 10.1101/2023.04.03.23288037
A1 Taylor, Samuel
A1 Lavalley, Claire A.
A1 Hakimi, Navid
A1 Stewart, Jennifer L.
A1 Ironside, Maria
A1 Zheng, Haixia
A1 White, Evan
A1 Guinjoan, Salvador
A1 Paulus, Martin P.
A1 Smith, Ryan
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/05/2023.04.03.23288037.abstract
AB Background Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a major public health risk. Yet, our understanding of the mechanisms that maintain these disorders remains incomplete. In a recent computational modeling study, we found initial evidence that SUDs are associated with slower learning rates from negative outcomes and less value-sensitive choice (low “action precision”), which could help explain continued substance use despite harmful consequences.Methods Here we aimed to replicate and extend these results in a pre-registered study with a new sample of 168 individuals with SUDs and 99 healthy comparisons (HCs). We performed the same computational modeling and group comparisons as in our prior report (doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108208) to confirm previously observed effects. After completing all pre-registered replication analyses, we then combined the previous and current datasets (N = 468) to assess whether differences were transdiagnostic or driven by specific disorders.Results Replicating prior results, SUDs showed slower learning rates for negative outcomes in both Bayesian and frequentist analyses (η2=.02). Previously observed differences in action precision were not confirmed. Logistic regressions including all computational parameters as predictors in the combined datasets could differentiate several specific disorders from HCs, but could not differentiate most disorders from each other.Conclusions These results provide robust evidence that individuals with SUDs have more difficulty adjusting behavior in the face of negative outcomes than HCs. They also suggest this effect is common across several different SUDs. Future research should examine its neural basis and whether learning rates could represent a new treatment target or moderator of treatment outcome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the NIGMS (P20 GM121312; PI:MPP) and the Laureate Institute for Brain Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Western IRB gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors