PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Papadimitriou, Nikos AU - Kazmi, Nabila AU - Dimou, Niki AU - Tsilidis, Konstantinos K AU - Martin, Richard M AU - Lewis, Sarah J AU - Lynch, Brigid M AU - Hoffmeister, Michael AU - Kweon, Sun-Seog AU - Li, Li AU - Milne, Roger L AU - Sakoda, Lori C AU - Schoen, Robert E AU - Phipps, Amanda I AU - Figueiredo, Jane C AU - Peters, Ulrike AU - Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C. AU - Gunter, Marc J AU - Murphy, Neil TI - Leisure time sedentary behaviour and risks of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis AID - 10.1101/2023.03.01.23286492 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.03.01.23286492 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/22/2023.03.01.23286492.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/22/2023.03.01.23286492.full AB - Sedentary behaviours have been associated with increased risks of some common cancers in epidemiological studies; however, it is unclear if these associations are causal. We examined potential causal associations between self-reported leisure television watching and computer use and risks of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer using a two-sample Mendelian randomization framework. Genetic variants were identified from a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS). Cancer data were obtained from cancer GWAS consortia. Additional sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the robustness of the results. A 1-standard deviation increment in hours of television watching increased risk of breast (OR: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05,1.26) and colorectal cancer (OR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.16,1.49) with little evidence of an association for prostate cancer risk. In multivariable models adjusted for years of education, the effect estimates for television watching were attenuated (breast cancer, OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.92,1.27; colorectal cancer, OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.90,1.31). Post-hoc analyses showed that years of education might have a possible confounding and mediating role in the association between television watching with breast and colorectal cancer. Consistent results were observed by sex (colorectal cancer), anatomical subsites, and cancer subtypes. There was little evidence of associations between computer use and cancer risk. We found evidence of positive associations between hours of television watching and risks of breast and colorectal cancer. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the complex role of education. Future studies using objective measures of exposure can provide new insights into the possible role of sedentary behaviour in cancer development.Novelty and impact Evidence from observational studies that examined associations between sedentary behaviours and common cancers is mixed and causality is uncertain. In our Mendelian randomization analyses, higher levels of leisure television watching were found to increase the risks of breast and colorectal cancer, suggesting that the that the promotion of lowering sedentary behaviour time could be an effective strategy in the primary prevention of these commonly diagnosed cancers.Article category Cancer EpidemiologyCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by a WCRF grant (WCRF_2020_019). RMM is supported by a Cancer Research UK Programme Grant, the Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme (C18281/A29019). RMM is a member of the MRC IEU which is supported by the Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_12013/1-9). RMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Bristol Biomedical Research Centre which is funded by the National Institute for Health Research and is a partnership between University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. BML is supported by the Victorian Cancer Agency (MCRF-18005). SJL is supported by a WCRF grant (WCRF_2020_019).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants provided written informed consent. Ethics were approved by respective institutional review boards.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe summary statistics used in this study are outlined in the supplementary materialsBMIbody mass indexIVWinverse-variance weightedGWASgenome-wide association studyLDlinkage disequilibriumMRMendelian randomizationPSAprostate-specific antigenORodds ratioRCTrandomised control trialSNPsingle nucleotide polymorphismSDStandard deviation