PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Smith, David R M AU - Chervet, Sophie AU - Pinettes, Théo AU - Shirreff, George AU - Jijón, Sofía AU - Oodally, Ajmal AU - Jean, Kévin AU - Opatowski, Lulla AU - Kernéis, Solen AU - Temime, Laura TI - How have mathematical models contributed to understanding the transmission and control of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings? A systematic search and review AID - 10.1101/2023.03.17.23287403 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.03.17.23287403 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/20/2023.03.17.23287403.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/20/2023.03.17.23287403.full AB - Background Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, mathematical models have been widely used to inform public health recommendations regarding COVID-19 control in healthcare settings.Objectives To systematically review SARS-CoV-2 transmission models in healthcare settings, and summarise their contributions to understanding nosocomial COVID-19.Methods Systematic search and review.Data sources Published articles indexed in PubMed.Study eligibility criteria Modelling studies describing dynamic inter-individual transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings, published by mid-February 2022.Participants and interventions Any population and intervention described by included models.Assessment of risk of bias Not appropriate for modelling studies.Methods of data synthesis Structured narrative review.Results Models have mostly focused on acute care and long-term care facilities in high-income countries. Models have quantified outbreak risk across different types of individuals and facilities, showing great variation across settings and pandemic periods. Regarding surveillance, routine testing – rather than symptom-based testing – was highlighted as essential for COVID-19 prevention due to high rates of silent transmission. Surveillance impacts were found to depend critically on testing frequency, diagnostic sensitivity, and turn-around time. Healthcare re-organization was also found to have large epidemiological impacts: beyond obvious benefits of isolating cases and limiting inter-individual contact, more complex strategies such as staggered staff scheduling and immune-based cohorting reduced infection risk. Finally, vaccination impact, while highly effective for limiting COVID-19 burden, varied substantially depending on assumed mechanistic impacts on infection acquisition, symptom onset and transmission. Studies were inconsistent regarding which individuals to prioritize for interventions, probably due to the high diversity of settings and populations investigated.Conclusions Modelling results form an extensive evidence base that may inform control strategies for future waves of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral respiratory pathogens. We propose new avenues for future models of healthcare-associated outbreaks, with the aim of enhancing their efficiency and contributions to decision-making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received funding from the MODCOV project from the Fondation de France (Grant 106059) as part of the alliance framework ″Tous unis contre le virus″, the Université Paris-Saclay (AAP Covid-19 2020) and the French government through its National Research Agency project SPHINX-17-CE36-0008-01 and the ″Investissement d″Avenir″ program, Laboratoire d″Excellence ″Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases″ (Grant ANR-10-LABX-62- IBEID). The work was also supported directly by internal resources from the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Institut Pasteur, le Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, and the Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Université Paris-Saclay.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript