RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Discrepancies in patient and caregiver ratings of personality change in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.09.23287003
DO 10.1101/2023.03.09.23287003
A1 Rhodes, Emma
A1 Mechanic-Hamilton, Dawn
A1 Phillips, Jeffrey S.
A1 McMillan, Corey
A1 Bahena, Alejandra
A1 Vitali, Nykko
A1 Hlava, Quinn
A1 Cook, Philip
A1 Gee, James
A1 Grossman, Murray
A1 Massimo, Lauren
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/13/2023.03.09.23287003.abstract
AB Background Assessment of personality change in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) is clinically meaningful but complicated by patient (i.e., reduced insight) and informant (i.e., caregiver burden) factors that confound accurate reporting of personality traits. This study assessed the impact of caregiver burden on informant report of Big Five personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness) and investigated regional cortical volumes associated with larger discrepancies in patient and informant report of Big Five personality traits.Methods Sixty-four ADRD participants with heterogeneous neurodegenerative clinical phenotypes and their informants completed the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Caregiver burden was measured using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Discrepancy scores were computed as the absolute value of the difference between patient and informant ratings for all BFI trait scores and summed to create a global score. Regional grey matter volumes from T1-weighted 3T MRI were normalized to intracranial volume and related to global Big Five discrepancy scores using linear regression.Results Higher levels of caregiver burden were associated with higher informant ratings of patient Neuroticism (ß =0.27, p =.016) and lower informant ratings of patient Agreeableness (ß =-0.32, p =.002), Conscientiousness (ß =-0.3, p =.002), and Openness (ß =-0.34, p =.003) independent of disease severity. Patients with greater Big Five discrepancy scores showed smaller cortical volumes in right medial PFC (β = -0.00015, p = .002), right superior temporal gyrus (β = -0.00028, p = .025), and left inferior frontal gyrus (β = -0.00006 p = .013).Conclusions Informant ratings of personality traits in ADRD can be confounded by caregiver burden, highlighting the need for more objective measures of personality and behavior in dementia samples. Discrepancies between informant and patient ratings of personality may additionally reflect loss of insight secondary to cortical atrophy in frontal and temporal structures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (P01-AG066597, P30-AG072979, R01-AG054519, K23-AG065499, and K01-AG061277).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors