PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Chan, Huan-Keat AU - Sem, Xiaohui AU - Ivanova, Elena AU - Pannir Selvam, Sheela Bai A/P AU - Salleh, Narul Aida AU - Mohamad Gani, Abdul Hafiz Bin AU - Fajardo, Emmanuel AU - Shilton, Sonjelle AU - Abu Hassan, Muhammad Radzi TI - Usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based hepatitis C virus self-testing among the general population and men who have sex with men in Malaysia AID - 10.1101/2023.03.09.23287065 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.03.09.23287065 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/10/2023.03.09.23287065.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/10/2023.03.09.23287065.full AB - Hepatitis C self-testing (HCVST) is emerging as an additional strategy that could help to expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a study to assess the usability and acceptability of two types of HCVST, oral fluid- and blood-based, among the general population and men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia.An observational study was conducted in three primary care centres in Malaysia. Participants who were layman users performed the oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST sequentially. Usability was assessed by calculating the rate of errors observed, the rate of difficulties faced by participants as well as inter-reader (self-test interpreted by self-tester vs interpreted by trained user) and inter-operator concordances (self-test vs test performed by trained user). The acceptability of HCV self-testing was assessed using an interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire. Participants were also required to read contrived test results which included “positive”, “negative”, and “invalid”.There was a total of 200 participants (100 general population, 100 MSM; mean age 33.6 ± 14.0 years). We found a high acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST across both general population and MSM. User errors, related to timekeeping and reading within stipulated time, were common. However, the majority of the participants were still able to obtain and interpret results correctly, including that of contrived results. The high acceptability of HCVST among the participants did not appreciably change after they had experienced both tests, with 97.0% of all participants indicating they would be willing to use HCVST again and 98.5% of them indicating they would recommend it to people they knew. There was no significant difference between the general population and MSM in these aspects.Our study demonstrates that both oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST are highly acceptable among both the general population and MSM. Both populations also showed comparable ability to conduct the tests and interpret the results. Overall, this study suggests that HCVST could be introduced as an addition to existing HCV testing services in Malaysia. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal positioning of self-testing alongside facility-based testing to expand access to HCV diagnosis in the country.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Government of Netherlands funded the study but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study (protocol number: NMRR-20-1794-56098) was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.