RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Approaches to improving mental health care for autistic people: a systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.10.23287101
DO 10.1101/2023.03.10.23287101
A1 Loizou, Sofia
A1 Pemovska, Tamara
A1 Stefanidou, Theodora
A1 Foye, Una
A1 Cooper, Ruth
A1 Kular, Ariana
A1 Greenburgh, Anna
A1 Baldwin, Helen
A1 Griffiths, Jessica
A1 Saunders, Katherine R. K.
A1 Barnett, Phoebe
A1 Minchin, Matilda
A1 Brady, Gráinne
A1 Ahmed, Nafiso
A1 Parker, Jennie
A1 Chipp, Beverley
A1 Olive, Rachel Rowan
A1 Jackson, Robin
A1 Timmerman, Amanda
A1 Sapiets, Suzi
A1 Driskell, Eva
A1 Parsons, Bethany
A1 Spain, Debbie
A1 Totsika, Vaso
A1 Mandy, Will
A1 Pender, Richard
A1 Clery, Philippa
A1 Trevillion, Kylee
A1 Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
A1 Simpson, Alan
A1 Johnson, Sonia
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/10/2023.03.10.23287101.abstract
AB Background Autistic people have a high likelihood of developing mental health difficulties but a low chance of receiving effective mental health care. Therefore, there is a need to identify and examine strategies to improve mental health care for autistic people.Aims To identify strategies that have been implemented to improve access, experiences of care and mental health outcomes for autistic adults and examine evidence on their acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness.Method A co-produced systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, medRxiv and PsyArXiv were searched. We included all study designs reporting acceptability or feasibility outcomes and empirical quantitative study designs reporting effectiveness outcomes. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.Results A total of 29 articles were identified. These included 16 studies of adapted mental health interventions, seven studies of service improvements and six studies of bespoke mental health interventions developed for autistic people. There was no conclusive evidence on effectiveness. However, most bespoke and adapted approaches appeared to be feasible and acceptable. Identified adaptations appeared to be acceptable and feasible, including increasing knowledge and detection of autism, providing environmental adjustments and communication accommodations, accommodating individual differences, and modifying the structure and content of interventions.Conclusion Many identified strategies are feasible and acceptable and can be readily implemented in services with the potential to make mental health care more suitable for autistic people, but important research gaps remain. Future research should address these and investigate a co-produced package of service improvement measures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis paper presents independent research commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme and conducted by the NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit (MHPRU). The funder has no role in the study design, data analysis, write-up of the manuscript or the decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData were collected from publicly available research papers which are referenced.