RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Myocardial Infarction across COVID-19 Pandemic Phases: Insights from the Veterans Health Affairs System
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.07.23286963
DO 10.1101/2023.03.07.23286963
A1 Yong, Celina
A1 Graham, Laura
A1 Beyene, Tariku J.
A1 Sadri, Shirin
A1 Hong, Juliette
A1 Burdon, Tom
A1 Fearon, William F.
A1 Asch, Steven M.
A1 Turakhia, Mintu
A1 Heidenreich, Paul
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/08/2023.03.07.23286963.abstract
AB Background Cardiovascular procedural treatments were deferred at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic, with unclear impact on patients presenting with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI).Methods In a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in the U.S. Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from 1/1/19 to 10/30/22 (n=67,125), procedural treatments and outcomes were compared between the pre-pandemic period and six unique pandemic phases (1: Acute phase, 2: Community spread, 3: First Peak, 4: Post-Vaccine, 5. Second Peak, 6. Recovery). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess association between pandemic phases and 30-day mortality.Results NSTEMI volumes dropped significantly with the pandemic onset (62.7% of pre-pandemic peak) and did not revert to pre-pandemic levels in subsequent phases, even after vaccine availability. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) volumes declined proportionally. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, NSTEMI patients experienced higher 30-day mortality during Phase 2 and 3, even after adjustment for COVID-19 positive status, demographics, baseline comorbidities, and receipt of procedural treatment (adjusted OR for Phase 2-3 combined: 1.26 [95% CI 1.13-1.43], p<0.01). Patients receiving VA-paid community care had a higher adjusted risk of 30-day mortality compared to those at VA hospitals across all six pandemic phases.Conclusions Higher mortality after NSTEMI occurred during the initial spread and first peak of the pandemic, but resolved before the second, higher peak – suggesting effective adaptation of care delivery but a costly delay to implementation. Investigation into the vulnerabilities of the early pandemic spread are vital to informing future resource-constrained practices.What is New?After the initial significant decline in NSTEMI presentations during the acute phase of the pandemic, volumes of NSTEMI presentations and procedural treatment have not reverted to pre-pandemic levels despite widespread availability of vaccines in the Veterans Health Administration.Compared to the pre-pandemic period, 30-day mortality after NSTEMI increased during the initial spread and first pandemic peak (Phases 2 and 3) -- but resolved before the subsequent highest pandemic peak of Phase 5 -- suggesting a delay to implementation of adapted systems of cardiovascular care.The increased mortality was not significantly mediated by the decline in procedural volumes, suggesting appropriate triage of procedural care during the pandemic.What are the Clinical Implications?The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a lasting impact on health-seeking behaviors among NSTEMI patients, with unclear long-term effects of this increased threshold to obtain cardiovascular care.Investigation into the vulnerabilities that occurred during initial phases of the pandemic are urgently needed to inform ongoing and future resource-constrained practices.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCMY is funded by a Career Development Award from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development. This work was also funded by a VA Rapid Response COVID-19 grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Stanford Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData in the manuscript is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.