RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Artificial Intelligence Neural Network Consistently Interprets Lung Ultrasound Artifacts in Hospitalized Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.02.23286687
DO 10.1101/2023.03.02.23286687
A1 Fox, Thomas H.
A1 Gare, Gautam R.
A1 Hutchins, Laura E.
A1 Perez, Victor S.
A1 Rodriguez, Ricardo
A1 Smith, David L.
A1 Brito-Encarnacion, Francisco X.
A1 Danrad, Raman
A1 Tran, Hai V.
A1 Lowery, Peter B.
A1 Montgomery, David J.
A1 Zamorra, Kevin A.
A1 Krishnan, Amita
A1 Galeotti, John M.
A1 deBoisblanc, Bennett P.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/05/2023.03.02.23286687.abstract
AB Background Interpretation of lung ultrasound artifacts by clinicians can be inconsistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) may perform this task more consistently.Research Question Can AI characterize lung ultrasound artifacts similarly to humans, and can AI interpretation be corroborated by clinical data?Study Design and Methods Lung sonograms (n=665) from a convenience sample of 172 subjects were prospectively obtained using a pre-specified protocol and matched to clinical and radiographic data. Three investigators scored sonograms for A-lines and B-lines. AI was trained using 142 subjects and then tested on a separate dataset of 30 patients. Three radiologists scored similar anatomic regions of contemporary radiographs for interstitial and alveolar infiltrates to corroborate sonographic findings. The ratio of oxyhemoglobin saturation:fraction of inspired oxygen (S/F) was also used for comparison. The primary outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the median investigator scoring of artifacts and AI interpretation.Results In the test set, the correlation between the median investigator score and the AI score was moderate to good for A lines (ICC 0.73, 95% CI [0.53-0.89]), and moderate for B lines (ICC 0.66, 95% CI [0.55-0.75]). The degree of variability between the AI score and the median investigator score for each video was similar to the variability between each investigator’s score and the median score. The correlation among radiologists was moderate (ICC 0.59, 95% CI [0.52-0.82]) for interstitial infiltrates and poor for alveolar infiltrates (ICC 0.33, 95% CI [0.07-0.58]). There was a statistically significant correlation between AI scored B-lines and the degree of interstitial opacities for five of six lung zones. Neither AI nor human-scored artifacts were consistently associated with S/F.Interpretation Using a limited dataset, we showed that AI can interpret lung ultrasound A-lines and B-lines in a fashion that could be clinically useful.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center IRB #1509.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData cannot be shared publicly because of stipulations of the IRB approved protocol. Data are available from the LSU IRB for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.AIArtificial intelligence neural networkBLUE 1Point 1 on left side of thoraxBLUE 2Point 2 on left side of thoraxBLUE 3Point 3 on left side of thoraxBLUE 4Point 1 on right side of thoraxBLUE 5Point 2 on right side of thoraxBLUE 6Point 3 on right side of thoraxCOPDChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseICCIntraclass correlation coefficientUSUltrasoundS/FOxyhemoglobin saturation divided by fraction of inspired oxygen