RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cerebral blood flow pattern in patients with carotid artery stenosis with low trans-stenotic blood flow
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.03.01.23286660
DO 10.1101/2023.03.01.23286660
A1 Zarrinkoob, Laleh
A1 Myrnäs, Sanne
A1 Wåhlin, Anders
A1 Eklund, Anders
A1 Malm, Jan
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/02/2023.03.01.23286660.abstract
AB Background Compromised cerebral blood flow has been identified as a contributing risk factor for future ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Nevertheless, the hemodynamic impact of carotid stenosis is rarely evaluated. The aim of this observational cross-section study was to investigate how a reduced internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow rate (BFR), rather than stenosis degree, relates to BFR in the cerebral arteries.Methods Four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-PCMRI) was used to measure cerebral blood flow in 38 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%), being considered for carotid endarterectomy. The BFR in the cerebral arteries was compared between two subgroups that were based on the BFR in the symptomatic (ipsilateral) ICA: I. reduced ICA flow (<160 mL/min) i.e., 2 SD <normal ICA BFR; II. preserved ICA flow (≥160 mL/min). Furthermore, BFR laterality was defined as a difference in the paired ipsilateral-contralateral arteries within the groups.Results The degree of stenosis was not significantly different between the two subgroups (72% vs. 80%; P=0.09). In the reduced group compared to the preserved ICA flow group, a reduced BFR was found in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) (108±32 vs. 136±24 mL/min; P<0.01) and anterior cerebral artery (A1 segment) (−6±47 vs. 81±27 mL/min; P<0.001), while the BFR was increased in the contralateral A1 segment (152±79 vs. 82±41 mL/min; P<0.001). There was also a reversed BFR in the posterior communicating artery and ophthalmic artery on the ipsilateral side in the group with reduced ICA flow. BFR laterality was observed in all paired arteries in the reduced ICA flow group (P<0.05), while there was no laterality in the preserved ICA flow group (P>0.05).Conclusions 4D-PCMRI revealed compromised cerebral blood flow in patients with carotid stenosis, not possible to detect by solely analyzing the stenosis degree. In patients with reduced ICA flow, collateral recruitment was not sufficient to maintain symmetrical BFR distribution to the two hemispheres.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe study was not interventional and did not evaluate any drugs.Funding StatementThe following financial support has been conducted for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: the Swedish Research Council, grant numbers 2015-05616; 2017-04949; the County Council of Västerbotten; and the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, grant number 20140592.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval was obtained by The Ethical Review Board of Umeå University, DNR 2011-440-31 M, and the study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in tis manuscript is available on request