PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alyazidi, Faleh
AU  - Shakely, Deler
AU  - Petzold, Max
AU  - Alyazidi, Fawaz
AU  - Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith
TI  - Dying to make a care policy: Community perception of causes of deaths using standardized verbal autopsy method: Saudi type 2 diabetes mellitus register data
AID  - 10.1101/2023.02.16.23286020
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.02.16.23286020
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/19/2023.02.16.23286020.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/19/2023.02.16.23286020.full
AB  - Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a serious global health issue which significantly impacts public health and socioeconomic development. Exploring how the community perceives the causes of deaths and their associated risk factors is crucial for public health. This study combines verbal autopsy (VA) with the Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) register to explore community perceptions of causes of death and associated influential factors in the western region of Saudi Arabia. 302 VA interviews were conducted with relatives or caregivers of deceased who died between 2017 and 2021 based on T2DM medical register from Alnoor Specialist Hospital in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. Cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) obtained from the VA using the InterVA-5 model were utilized to assess community perception. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to determine factors influencing community perceptions of causes of death. Lin’s CCC with 95% CI was used to analyze the concordance for the CSMFs from verbal autopsy causes of death (VACoD) as a presumed reference standard and family-reported causes of death (FRCoD). The outcomes of this study demonstrate a generally broad spectrum of community perceived mortalities, with some critical misconceptions based on the type of death and the deceased’s background and characteristics, with an overall CCC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.20-1.00; p=003). The study findings demonstrate that community perception is weak if the deceased was male compared to female (aOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.26 –1.03) and if the deceased was >=80 years compared to 34–59 years (aOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.16-1.38), but it significantly improves among married compared to single (aOR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.02 –4.42). The Saudi community perception of causes of death with reported type 2 diabetes was relatively plausible but varied substantially based on the type of death, sex, age >=80 years, and other vital events like marital status. Higher or lower community perception is attributed to how people may perceive risk factors associated with the causes of death, which can guide public health planning and interventional programs. The study findings further emphasize the need to employ robust and standardized VA methods within the routine medical services for a systemized assessment of families’ reported causes of death.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors have not received any funding or benefits to conduct this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study received the ethical approval to perform the VA interviews from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Makkah Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia (IRB Number: H-02-K-076-0321-478). The study was aligned with the Declaration of Helsinki. The interviews were conducted via phone as a substitute for the standard face-to-face method due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Informed consent was fully respected at both individual and household levels, with the right to refuse or withdraw from interviews. Interviews were conducted after obtaining formal verbal consent from the study participants. Additionally, data was only accessed by the principal researcher for the purposes of the study to ensure the confidentiality and anonymity of the participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe Study data are shared for reviewing purposes only. https://github.com/FalehSaud/VA-data-.git