PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Li, Zhaolong Adrian AU - Cai, Yuqi AU - Taylor, Rita L. AU - Eisenstein, Sarah A. AU - Barch, Deanna M. AU - Marek, Scott AU - Hershey, Tamara TI - Associations between socioeconomic status and white matter microstructure in children: indirect effects via obesity and cognition AID - 10.1101/2023.02.09.23285150 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.02.09.23285150 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/10/2023.02.09.23285150.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/10/2023.02.09.23285150.full AB - Importance Both neighborhood and household socioeconomic disadvantage relate to negative health outcomes and altered brain structure in children. It is unclear whether such findings extend to white matter development, and via what mechanisms socioeconomic status (SES) influences the brain.Objective To test independent associations between neighborhood and household SES indicators and white matter microstructure in children, and examine whether body mass index and cognitive function (a proxy of environmental cognitive/sensory stimulation) may plausibly mediate these associations.Design This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, an ongoing 10-year cohort study tracking child health.Setting School-based recruitment at 21 U.S. sites.Participants Children aged 9 to 11 years and their parents/caregivers completed baseline assessments between October 1st, 2016 and October 31st, 2018. Data analysis was conducted from July to December 2022.Exposures Neighborhood disadvantage was derived from area deprivation indices at primary residence. Household SES indicators were total income and the highest parental education attainment.Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-one major white matter tracts were segmented from diffusion-weighted images. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) model was implemented to measure restricted normalized directional (RND; reflecting oriented myelin organization) and isotropic (RNI; reflecting glial/neuronal cell bodies) diffusion in each tract. Obesity-related measures were body mass index (BMI), BMI z-scores, and waist circumference, and cognitive performance was assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Linear mixed-effects models tested the associations between SES indicators and scanner-harmonized RSI metrics. Structural equation models examined indirect effects of obesity and cognitive performance in the significant associations between SES and white mater microstructure summary principal components. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, pubertal development stage, intracranial volume, and head motion.Results The analytical sample included 8842 children (4299 [48.6%] girls; mean age [SD], 9.9 [0.7] years). Greater neighborhood disadvantage and lower parental education were independently associated with lower RSI-RND in forceps major and corticospinal/pyramidal tracts, and had overlapping associations in the superior longitudinal fasciculus. Lower cognition scores and greater obesity-related measures partially accounted for these SES associations with RSI-RND. Lower household income was related to higher RSI-RNI in almost every tract, and greater neighborhood disadvantage had similar effects in primarily frontolimbic tracts. Lower parental education was uniquely linked to higher RSI-RNI in forceps major. Greater obesity-related measures partially accounted for these SES associations with RSI-RNI. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses and mostly corroborated using traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).Conclusions and Relevance These cross-sectional results demonstrate that both neighborhood and household contexts are relevant to white matter development in children, and suggest cognitive performance and obesity as possible pathways of influence. Interventions targeting obesity reduction and improving cognition from multiple socioeconomic angles may ameliorate brain health in low-SES children.Question Are neighborhood and household socioeconomic levels associated with children’s brain white matter microstructure, and if so, do obesity and cognitive performance (reflecting environmental stimulation) mediate the associations?Findings In a cohort of 8842 children, higher neighborhood disadvantage, lower household income, and lower parental education had independent and overlapping associations with lower restricted directional diffusion and greater restricted isotropic diffusion in white matter. Greater body mass index and poorer cognitive performance partially mediated these associations.Meaning Both neighborhood and household poverty may contribute to altered white matter development in children. These effects may be partially explained by obesity incidence and poorer cognitive performance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R00MH121518 (Marek), the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Summer Research Program (Li), the Society for Neuroscience Trainee Professional Development Award (Li), and the WUSTL McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience. The ABCD Study is supported by the NIH and federal partners (awards U01DA041048, U01DA050989, U01DA051016, U01DA041022, U01DA051018, U01DA051037, U01DA050987, U01DA041174, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041028, U01DA041134, U01DA050988, U01DA051039, U01DA041156, U01DA041025, U01DA041120, U01DA051038, U01DA041148, U01DA041093, U01DA041089, U24DA041123, and U24DA041147). A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All data involved in the current study were either directly from or derived from openly available data of The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. The ABCD Study data are publicly available through the National Institute of Mental Health Data (NIDA) Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/abcd). The ABCD Study data used in this report came from The ABCD Study Data Release 4.0 (DOI: 10.15154/1523041, October 2021). The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, San Diego, approved all aspects of the ABCD Study (Auchter et al., 2018). Institutional review boards at each individual study site approved procedures; parents/caregivers provided written consent and children gave verbal assent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData in this study were from the baseline measurements published in 2021 as part of the ABCD Curated Data Release 4.0, available at DOI: 10.15154/1523041. The ABCD data repository grows and may be modified as more data are collected and processed. This study is available in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) at DOI: 10.15154/1528516.ABCDAdolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentADIarea deprivation indexATRanterior thalamic radiationsBMIbody mass indexCCcorpus callosumCgCcingulate cingulumCgHparahippocampal cingulumCIconfidence intervalCSTcorticospinal/pyramidal tractDTIdiffusion tensor imagingDVdependent variableDWIdiffusion-weighted imageFAfractional anisotropyFDRfalse discovery rateFmajforceps majorFminforceps minorFxfornixICVintracranial volumesIFOFinferior frontal-occipital fasciculusIFSFCinferior-frontal to superior-frontal cortical tractILFinferior longitudinal fasciculusIVindependent variableMDmean diffusivityMRImagnetic resonance imagingPCprincipal componentPCAprincipal component analysesPDSpubertal development stagepSLFparietal superior longitudinal fasciculusRNDrestricted normalized directionalRNIrestricted normalized isotropicRSIrestriction spectrum imagingSCSsuperior-corticostriatal tractSDstandard deviationSEstandard errorSESsocioeconomic statusSIFCstriatal to inferior-frontal cortical tractSLFsuperior longitudinal fasciculusSTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologytSLFtemporal superior longitudinal fasciculusUncuncinate fasciculus