RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.02.09.23285675
DO 10.1101/2023.02.09.23285675
A1 Leventopoulos, Georgios
A1 Travlos, Christoforos K.
A1 Aronis, Konstantinos N.
A1 Anagnostopoulou, Virginia
A1 Patrinos, Panagiotis
A1 Papageorgiou, Aggeliki
A1 Perperis, Angelos
A1 Gale, Chris P.
A1 Davlouros, Periklis
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/10/2023.02.09.23285675.abstract
AB Background Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) may have detrimental effects in ventricular function. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) is a new pacing strategy that appears to have better results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of LBBAP vs RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.Methods Medline, Embase and Pubmed databases were searched for studies comparing LBBAP with RVP. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and complications. QRS duration, mechanical synchrony and LVEF changes were also assessed. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using random and fixed effects models.Results Twenty-five trials with 4250 patients (2127 LBBAP) were included in the analysis. LBBAP was associated with lower risk for HFH (RR:0.33, CI 95%:0.21 to 0.50; p<0.001), all-cause mortality (RR:0.52 CI 95%:0.34 to 0.80; p=0.003), and AF occurrence (RR:0.43 CI 95%:0.27 to 0.68; p<0.001) than RVP. Lead related complications were not different between the two groups (p=0.780). QRSd was shorter in the LBBAP group at follow-up (WMD: -32.20 msec, CI 95%: -40.70 to -23.71; p<0.001) and LBBAP achieved better intraventricular mechanical synchrony than RVP (SMD: -1.77, CI 95%: -2.45 to -1.09; p<0.001). LBBAP had similar pacing thresholds (p=0.860) and higher R wave amplitudes (p=0.009) than RVP.Conclusions LBBAP has better clinical outcomes, preserves ventricular electrical and mechanical synchrony and has excellent pacing parameters, with no difference in complications compared to RVP.What is knownLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a method of conduction system pacing with higher procedural success rate and less limitations compared to His bundle pacing (HBP).Right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes electromechanical dyssynchrony, which may result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction in some patients.What the study addsWe examined in a systematic review and meta-analysis whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes, electromechanical synchronization, and safety between LBBAP and RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author at levent2669{at}gmail.com.AFatrial fibrillationAVBatrioventricular blockAVNatrioventricular nodalBBBbundle branch blockBVPbiventricular pacingCRTcardiac resynchronization therapyDDdiastolic dysfunctionFUfollow-upHBPHis-bundle pacingHFHheart failure hospitalizationIVMDinterventricular mechanical delayLBBleft bundle branchLBBAPleft bundle branch area pacingLVEDDleft ventricular end-diastolic diameterLVEFleft ventricular ejection fractionRCTrandomized controlled trialRVPright ventricular pacingSNDsinus node dysfunctionSPWMDseptal to posterior wall motion delayStim-LVATstim to left ventricular activation time