PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Piasecki, Rebecca J. AU - Hunt, Elizabeth A. AU - Perrin, Nancy AU - Spaulding, Erin M. AU - Winters, Bradford AU - Samuel, Laura AU - Davidson, Patricia M. AU - Strobos, Nisha Chandra AU - Churpek, Matthew AU - Himmelfarb, Cheryl R. AU - the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines ® -Resuscitation Investigators TI - Using rapid response system trigger clusters to characterize patterns of clinical deterioration among hospitalized adult patients AID - 10.1101/2023.02.06.23285560 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.02.06.23285560 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/08/2023.02.06.23285560.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/08/2023.02.06.23285560.full AB - Background Many rapid response system (RRS) events are activated using multiple triggers. However, the patterns in which RRS triggers co-occur to activate the medical emergency team (MET) to respond to RRS events is unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the patterns (RRS trigger clusters) in which RRS triggers co-occur when used to activate the MET and determine the association of these clusters with outcomes using a sample of hospitalized adult patients.Methods RRS events among adult patients from January 2015 to December 2019 in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry’s MET module were examined (n=134,406). A combination of cluster analyses methods was performed to group patients into RRS trigger clusters based on the triggers used to activate their RRS events. Pearson’s chi-squared and ANOVA tests were used to examine differences in patient characteristics across RRS trigger clusters. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the associations between RRS trigger clusters and outcomes following RRS events.Results Six RRS trigger clusters were identified in the study sample. The RRS triggers that predominantly identified each cluster were as follows: tachypnea, new onset difficulty in breathing, and decreased oxygen saturation (Cluster 1); tachypnea, decreased oxygen saturation, and staff concern (Cluster 2); respiratory depression, decreased oxygen saturation, and mental status changes (Cluster 3); tachycardia and staff concern (Cluster 4); mental status changes (Cluster 5); hypotension and staff concern (Cluster 6). Significant differences in patient characteristics were observed across RRS trigger clusters. Patients in Clusters 3 and 6 were associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA [p<0.01]), while Cluster 4 was associated with a decreased likelihood of IHCA (p<0.01). All clusters were associated with an increased risk of mortality (p<0.01).Conclusions We discovered six novel RRS trigger clusters with differing relationships to adverse patient outcomes following RRS events. RRS trigger clusters may prove crucial in clarifying the associations between RRS events and adverse outcomes and may aid in clinician decision-making during RRS events.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot ApplicableFunding StatementRebecca J. Piasecki received support from the Predoctoral Fellowship in Interdisciplinary Training in Cardiovascular Health Research (T32 NR012704), the Philip D. Raso Scholarship provided by Nurses Educational Funds, Inc., and the Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (1F31NR018362-01A1). Erin M. Spaulding received support from the Postdoctoral Fellowship in Cardiovascular Epidemiology Institutional Training (NIH/NHLBI T32 HL007024).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:An IRB waiver of consent was obtained from the Johns Hopkins IRB.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used for this study were obtained from the MET Module of the Get With The Guidelines - Resuscitation registry, owned and administered by the American Heart Association, to whom any requests for data access should be addressed.