PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Koren, Yogev
AU  - Barzel, Oren
AU  - Shmuelof, Lior
AU  - Handelzalts, Shirley
TI  - Increased Spatiotemporal Variability after Stroke is not Just the Outcome of Walking Velocity
AID  - 10.1101/2023.02.03.23285403
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.02.03.23285403
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/07/2023.02.03.23285403.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/07/2023.02.03.23285403.full
AB  - Background Increased spatiotemporal gait variability is considered a clinical biomarker of ageing and pathology, and a predictor of future falls. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether the increased spatiotemporal variability observed in persons with stroke (PwS) is directly related to the pathology or simply reflects their choice of walking velocity.Research question Does increased spatiotemporal gait variability directly relate to motor coordination deficits after stroke?Methods Forty PwS and 20 healthy adults participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants performed the lower-extremity motor coordination test (LEMOCOT) on an electronic mat equipped with force sensors. Then, participants walked for 120 s over a computerized treadmill at their comfortable walking velocity. For the LEMOCOT we used the traditional score of in-target touch count and computed the absolute and variable error around the targets. For gait variability, we extracted the standard deviation of step time, step length, step velocity, and step width. Using a data-based approach, we generated a model of the relationship between velocity and variability and tested the correlations of the velocity-controlled values with the outcome measures from the LEMOCOT.Results PwS demonstrated increased variability in step time, step length, and step velocity, as well as decreased variability in step width, in comparison to healthy adults, even after controlling for walking velocity. After controlling for walking velocity, we observed that for PwS the LEMOCOT score correlated with the variance in step time, and the variable error in the LEMOCOT correlated with the variance in step length, in step width, and in step velocity. No significant correlation with any of the velocity-controlled step parameters was found for the absolute error in the LEMOCOT.Significance Decreased performance in the LEMOCOT was associated with increased spatiotemporal variability in PwS, regardless of their walking velocity. Our results demonstrate the connection between lower-extremity coordination impairments and deficits in gait function.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by BGU Marcus Research Support; the Ministry of Science & Technology, Israel (SH); and the Helmsley Charitable Trust through the Agricultural, Biological and Cognitive Robotics Initiative, as well as the Marcus Endowment Fund, both at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (YK).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Sheba Medical Center, Israel (approval number 6218-19-SMC) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors