PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fuzzell, Lindsay AU - Lake, Paige AU - Brownstein, Naomi C. AU - Fontenot, Holly B. AU - Whitmer, Ashley AU - Michel, Alexandra AU - McIntyre, McKenzie AU - Rossi, Sarah L. AU - Kajtezovich, Sidika AU - Vadaparampil, Susan T. AU - Perkins, Rebecca TI - Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study AID - 10.1101/2023.01.27.23285111 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.01.27.23285111 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/28/2023.01.27.23285111.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/28/2023.01.27.23285111.full AB - Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to reductions in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy. Therefore, in this mixed method study we explored perceived pandemic-related practice changes to cervical cancer screenings in federally qualified health centers.Methods Between October 2021 and June 2022, a national sample of 148 clinicians completed surveys; a subset (n=13) clinicians completed qualitative interviews. Most (86%) reported reduced cervical cancer screening early in the pandemic, and 28% reported continued reduction in services at the time of survey completion (October 2021-July 2022). Nearly half (45%) reported staff shortages impacting their ability to screen or track patients.Results Compared to clinicians in OBGYN/Women’s health, those in family medicine and other specialties were less likely to report maintaining or increasing screening compared to pre-pandemic. Advanced practice providers (compared to MDs/DOs,) and Hispanic/Latinx/other clinicians (compared to white non-Hispanic) were more likely to report maintaining or increasing screening vs. pre-pandemic. Most (91%) felt that screening using HPV self-sampling would be helpful to address screening backlogs. Qualitative interviews highlighted the impacts of staff shortages and strategies for improvement.Conclusions Identifying barriers to screening and instituting solutions in federally qualified health centers is critical to preventing cervical cancers among patients at highest risk.Funding This study was funded by the American Cancer Society, who had no role in the study’s design, conduct, or reporting.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialN/AFunding StatementThis study was funded by the American Cancer Society, who had no role in the study's design, conduct, or reporting.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by Moffitt Cancer Center's Scientific Review Committee and Institutional Review Board (MCC #20048) and Boston University Medical Center's Institutional Review Board (H-41533).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors are committed to high standards of research reproducibility and transparency. Source data files will be deposited into a public archive upon acceptance of the manuscript. We will deposit our dataset into the Dryad data repository upon acceptance.