RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.25.23285005
DO 10.1101/2023.01.25.23285005
A1 Gibbs, Hamish
A1 Musah, Anwar
A1 Seidu, Omar
A1 Ampofo, William
A1 Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin
A1 Gray, Jonathan
A1 Adewole, Wole A.
A1 Cheshire, James
A1 Marks, Michael
A1 Eggo, Rosalind M.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/28/2023.01.25.23285005.abstract
AB This paper demonstrates how two different methods used to calculate population-level mobility from Call Detail Records (CDR) produce varying predictions of the spread of epidemics informed by these data. Our findings are based on one CDR dataset describing inter-district movement in Ghana in 2021, produced using two different aggregation methodologies. One methodology, “all pairs,” is designed to retain long distance network connections while the other, “sequential” methodology is designed to accurately reflect the volume of travel between locations. We show how the choice of methodology feeds through models of human mobility to the predictions of a metapopulation SEIR model of disease transmission. We also show that this impact varies depending on the location of pathogen introduction and transmissibility. For central locations or highly transmissible diseases, we do not observe significant differences between aggregation methodologies on the predicted spread of disease. For less transmissible diseases or those introduced into remote locations, we find that the choice of aggregation methodology influences the speed of spatial spread as well as the size of the peak number of infections in individual districts. Our findings can help researchers and users of epidemiological models to understand how methodological choices at the level of model inputs may influence the results of models of infectious disease transmission, as well as the circumstances in which these choices do not alter model predictions.Author Summary Predicting the sub-national spread of infectious disease requires accurate measurements of inter-regional travel networks. Often, this information is derived from the patterns of mobile device connections to the cellular network. This travel data is then used as an input to epidemiological models of infection transmission, defining the likelihood that disease is “exported” between regions. In this paper, we use one mobile device dataset collected in Ghana in 2021, aggregated according to two different methodologies which represent different aspects of inter-regional travel. We show how the choice of aggregation methodology leads to different predicted epidemics, and highlight the conditions under which models of infection transmission may be influenced by methodological choices in the aggregation of travel data used to parameterize these models. For example, we show how aggregation methodology changes predicted epidemics for less-transmissible infections and under certain models of human movement. We also highlight areas of relative stability, where aggregation choices do not alter predicted epidemics, such as cases where an infection is highly transmissible or is introduced into a central location.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe following funding sources are acknowledged as providing funding for the named authors. EDCTP2 (RIA2020EF-2983-CSIGN: HPG, RME, MM). HDR UK (MR/S003975/1: RME). This research was partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care (NIHR200908: RME). ESRC UBEL Doctoral Training Partnership (HPG). UK MRC (MC_PC_19065: RME).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the LSHTM Research Committee (Ref: 22477) and the Noguchi Memorial Institute of Medical Research (Ref: 048/20-21).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCDR mobility data used in this study was provided by Vodafone Ghana in partnership with the Flowminder Foundation and Ghana Statistical Service. This data is available to researchers by application. Population data was publicly available 2020 constrained population counts in 100m grid cells (not UN-adjusted), downloaded from the WorldPop project. Code used in this study is available from: https://github.com/hamishgibbs/ghana_cdr_aggregation. https://github.com/hamishgibbs/ghana_cdr_aggregation