PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Antaki, Fares
AU  - Touma, Samir
AU  - Milad, Daniel
AU  - El-Khoury, Jonathan
AU  - Duval, Renaud
TI  - Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology: An Analysis of its Successes and Shortcomings
AID  - 10.1101/2023.01.22.23284882
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.01.22.23284882
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/26/2023.01.22.23284882.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/26/2023.01.22.23284882.full
AB  - We tested the accuracy of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), in the ophthalmology question-answering space using two popular multiple choice question banks used for the high-stakes Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) exam. The testing sets were of easy-to-moderate difficulty and were diversified, including recall, interpretation, practical and clinical decision-making problems. ChatGPT achieved 55.8% and 42.7% accuracy in the two 260-question simulated exams. Its performance varied across subspecialties, with the best results in general medicine and the worst in neuro-ophthalmology and ophthalmic pathology and intraocular tumors. These results are encouraging but suggest that specialising LLMs through domain-specific pre-training may be necessary to improve their performance in ophthalmic subspecialties.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. The specific question sets are proprietary of the BCSC Self-Assessment Program and OphthoQuestions.