RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Breastfeeding support for mothers of low birth weight infants using mother-to-mother peers in rural western Kenya - a feasibility study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.23.23284905
DO 10.1101/2023.01.23.23284905
A1 Dickinson, Fiona M
A1 Achieng, Florence
A1 K’Oloo, Alloys
A1 Otiti, Iwaret
A1 Tindi, Linda
A1 Boga, Mwanamvua
A1 Kimani, Mary
A1 Kiige, Laura
A1 Mellor, Kathy
A1 Dellicour, Stephanie
A1 Barsosio, Hellen C.
A1 Kariuki, Simon
A1 Nabwera, Helen M
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/25/2023.01.23.23284905.abstract
AB The majority of the 2.4 million neonates (infants<28 days) who died in 2020 were born weighing <2500g i.e. low birth weight (LBW). In Africa, approximately 1 in 10 neonates are LBW. The majority of those who survive beyond the neonatal period are undernourished, have neuro-developmental impairment, or die before their second birthday. Unaddressed feeding difficulties contribute significantly to these adverse outcomes. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using trained mother-to-mother peers (peer-mothers) to deliver breastfeeding support to mothers of LBW infants in healthcare facilities in rural Kenya.A mixed methods approach was employed, using structured observations, and pre- and post-intervention semi-structured interviews, with mothers, healthcare providers and peer-mothers. Six trained peer-mothers delivered the interventions to the mother-LBW infant pairs across eight healthcare facilities in Homa Bay County. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative data.From September-November 2021, 23 mothers and 26 LBW infants were recruited and received the intervention. All infants were born in a hospital, the median age of the infants was 1 day (Interquartile range, IQR 1,3), birth weight 2100g (IQR 1900, 2260) and recorded gestation 34 weeks (IQR 34,36). Although all mothers looked well, 4 (17%) showed no signs of bonding with their infant. One infant was too weak to suckle and was referred to healthcare providers. Key themes were challenges with infant feeding decision-making among mothers of LBW infants, community misconceptions of recommended infant feeding practices for LBW infants, and the integral role of peer-mothers in maternity units.Facility-based, breastfeeding peer support for LBW infants was feasible and acceptable in the context of resource constraints. It could improve uptake of appropriate infant feeding practices among these vulnerable infants and enhance their post-discharge survival and growth outcomes. This strategy warrants further evaluation in a larger study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a grant from the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Small Grants Programme 2020 awarded to Dr Helen Nabwera for the study entitled Developing a novel approach to improving postnatal breastfeeding support for mothers of low birthweight infants in rural Kenyan hospitals. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Kenya Medical Research Institute’s Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (Nairobi, Kenya) (ref: KEMRI/SERU/CGHR/05-03-371/4200) and the LSTM Research Ethics Committee (UK) (ref: 21/026).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData used in this study is provided as part of the submitted article.