RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Harmonization of ICF Body Structures and ICD-11 Anatomic Detail: one foundation for two classifications
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.07.22283825
DO 10.1101/2023.01.07.22283825
A1 Mea, Vincenzo Della
A1 Almborg, Ann-Helene
A1 Martinuzzi, Michela
A1 Tu, Samson W.
A1 Martinuzzi, Andrea
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/11/2023.01.07.22283825.abstract
AB The Family of International Classifications of the World Health Organization currently includes three reference classifications, namely International Classification of Diseases (ICD), International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), and International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI). Each of them serves a specific classification need. However, they share some common concepts that are present, in different forms, in two or all of them. One important set of shared concepts is the representation of human anatomy entities, which are not always modeled in the same way and with the same level of detail. To understand the relationships among the three anatomical representations, an effort is needed to compare them, identifying common areas, gaps, and compatible and incompatible modeling. The work presented here contributes to this effort, focusing on the anatomy representations in ICF and ICD-11.For this aim, three experts were asked to identify, for each entity in the ICF Body Structures, one or more entities in the ICD-11 Anatomic Detail that could be considered identical, broader or narrower. To do this, they used a specifically developed web application, which also automatically identified the most obvious equivalences.A total of 631 maps were independently identified by the three mappers for 218 ICF Body Structures, with an interobserver agreement of 93.5%. Together with 113 maps identified by the software, they were then consolidated into 434 relations. The results highlight some differences between the two classifications: in general, ICF is less detailed than ICD-11; ICF favors lumping of structures; in very few cases, the two classifications follow different anatomic models. For these issues, solutions have to be found that are compliant with the WHO approach to classification modeling and maintenance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAM received funs from the Ministry of Health of Italy, grant RC2021-22, The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe consolidated maps are made available in SSOM format (11) at https://github.com/whoficitc/harmonization/blob/main/ICF-ICD-anatomy-v1.tsv. https://github.com/whoficitc/harmonization/blob/main/ICF-ICD-anatomy-v1.tsv.