PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lewnard, Joseph A. AU - McLaughlin, John M. AU - Malden, Debbie AU - Hong, Vennis AU - Puzniak, Laura AU - Ackerson, Bradley K. AU - Lewin, Bruno J. AU - Kim, Jeniffer S. AU - Shaw, Sally F. AU - Takhar, Harpreet AU - Jodar, Luis AU - Tartof, Sara Y. TI - Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against hospital admission or death: a cohort study in a large US healthcare system AID - 10.1101/2022.10.02.22280623 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.10.02.22280623 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/10/2022.10.02.22280623.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/10/2022.10.02.22280623.full AB - Background In the United States, oral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid™) is authorized for use among patients aged ≥12 years with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection who are at risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization. However, effectiveness under current real-world prescribing practices in outpatient settings is unclear.Methods We undertook a matched observational cohort study of non-hospitalized cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection to compare outcomes among those who received or did not receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system. Cases were matched on testing date, age, sex, clinical status (including care received, presence or absence of acute COVID-19 symptoms at testing, and time from symptom onset to testing), history of vaccination, Charlson comorbidity index, prior-year healthcare utilization, and body mass index. Primary analyses evaluated effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in preventing hospital admission or death within 30 days after a positive test. Secondary analyses evaluated effectiveness against intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or death within 60 days after a positive test. We measured treatment effectiveness as (1–adjusted hazards ratio [aHR])×100%, estimating the aHR via Cox proportional hazards models.Results Analyses included 7,274 nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients and 126,152 non-recipients with positive results from SARS-CoV-2 tests undertaken in outpatient settings between 8 April and 7 October, 2022. Overall, 114,208 (85.6%) and 81,739 (61.3%) of 133,426 participants had received ≥2 and ≥3 COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. A total of 111,489 (83.6% of 133,426) cases were symptomatic at the point of testing, with 5,472 (75.2% of 7,274) treatment recipients and 84,657 (67.1% of 126,152) non-recipients testing within 0–5 days after symptom onset. Effectiveness in preventing hospital admission or death within 30 days after a positive test was 79.6% (95% confidence interval: 33.9% to 93.8%) for cases dispensed nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 0–5 days after symptom onset; within the subgroup of cases tested 0–5 days after symptom onset and dispensed treatment on the day of their test, effectiveness was 89.6% (50.2% to 97.8%).Effectiveness declined to 43.8% (–33.3% to 81.7%) for treatment course dispensed ≥6 days after symptom onset or to cases who were not experiencing acute clinical symptoms. Overall, for cases dispensed treatment at any time within their clinical course, effectiveness was 53.6% (6.6% to 77.0%). Effectiveness in preventing the secondary endpoint of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or death within 60 days after a positive test was 89.2% (–25.0% to 99.3%) for cases dispensed treatment 0–5 days after symptom onset and 84.1% (18.8% to 96.9%) for cases dispensed treatment at any time. Subgroup analyses identified similar effectiveness estimates among cases who had received ≥2 or ≥3 COVID-19 vaccine doses.Implications In a setting with high levels of COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake, receipt of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir 0–5 days after symptom onset was associated with substantial reductions in risk of hospital admission or death within 30 days after a positive outpatient SARS-CoV-2 test.Funding US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US National Institutes of HealthCompeting Interest StatementJAL discloses receipt of grants and honoraria from Pfizer, Inc. separately from this study. SYT discloses receipt of grants from Pfizer, Inc. separately from this study. LP, LJ, and JMM are employees of Pfizer, Inc.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (grant 75D3-121C11520 to SYT) and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health (grant R01-AI4812701A1 to JAL).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board, which granted a waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymized data that support the findings of this study may be made available from the investigative team in the following conditions: (1) agreement to collaborate with the study team on all publications, (2) provision of external funding for administrative and investigator time necessary for this collaboration, (3) demonstration that the external investigative team is qualified and has documented evidence of training for human subjects protections, and (4) agreement to abide by the terms outlined in data use agreements between institutions.