RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.09.23284263
DO 10.1101/2023.01.09.23284263
A1 Curila, Karol
A1 Jurak, Pavel
A1 Prinzen, Frits
A1 Jastrzebski, Marek
A1 Waldauf, Petr
A1 Halamek, Josef
A1 Tothova, Marketa
A1 Znojilova, Lucie
A1 Smisek, Radovan
A1 Kach, Jakub
A1 Poviser, Lukas
A1 Linkova, Hana
A1 Plesinger, Filip
A1 Moskal, Pawel
A1 Viscor, Ivo
A1 Vondra, Vlastimil
A1 Leinveber, Pavel
A1 Osmancik, Pavel
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/10/2023.01.09.23284263.abstract
AB Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern.Methods In patients with bradycardia, His bundle pacing (HBP), unipolar nonselective LBBP (nsLBBP), aLBBP, and right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) were performed. Timing of local ventricular activation, in leads V1-V8, was displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Durations of local depolarizations were determined as the width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude.Results aLBBP was feasible in 63 of 75 consecutive patients with successful nsLBBP. aLBBP significantly improved interventricular dyssynchrony (−9 ms (−12;−6) vs. −24 ms (−27;−21),), p < 0.001) and shortened local depolarization durations in V1–V4 (mean differences −7 ms to −5 ms (−11;−1), p < 0.05) compared to nsLBBP. Both aLBBP and HBP caused similar absolute levels of interventricular dyssynchrony (e-DYS −9 ms (−12; −6) vs. 10 ms (7;14); however, local depolarization durations in V1–V2 during aLBBP were longer than HBP (differences 5–9 ms (1;14), p < 0.05, with local depolarization duration in V1 during aLBBP being the same as during RVSP (difference 2 ms (−2;6), p = 0.52).Conclusion Although aLBBP significantly improved interventricular synchrony and depolarization duration of the septum and RV compared to unipolar nsLBBP, the resultant ventricular depolarization was still less physiological than during HBP.Competing Interest StatementAuthors from the Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, from Institute of Scientific Instruments, the Czech Academy of Sciences, and from the International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital have filed a European patent application EP 19212534.2: “Method of electrocardiographic signal processing and apparatus for performing the method.”, and are shareholders of the company VDI technologies. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThis paper was supported by the Charles University Research Program Cooperatio, Cardiovascular Science (KC), Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant number NU21-02-00584 (KC), National Institute for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research CarDia (project nr. LX22NPO5104) (KC), by the CAS project RVO:68081731 (PJ) and the European Regional Development Fund - Project ENOCH No.CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868 (PL).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, and all patients signed informed consent before enrollment.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.