PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Liu, Sophia Z AU - Tahmasebi, Ghazaal AU - Sheng, Ying AU - Dinov, Ivo D AU - Tsilimingras, Dennis AU - Liu, Xuefeng TI - Sex difference in the associations of socioeconomic status, cognitive function and brain volume with dementia in old adults: Findings from the OASIS study AID - 10.1101/2023.01.05.23284240 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.01.05.23284240 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/07/2023.01.05.23284240.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/07/2023.01.05.23284240.full AB - Background Sex differences in the association of cognitive function and imaging measures with dementia have not been fully investigated while sex-based investigation of dementia has been discussed. Understanding sex differences in the dementia-related socioeconomic, cognitive, and imaging measurements is important for uncovering sex-related pathways to dementia and facilitating early diagnosis, family planning, and cost control.Methods We selected data from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies with longitudinal measurements of brain volumes on 150 individuals aged 60 to 96 years. Dementia status was determined using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, and Alzheimer’s disease was diagnosed as a CDR of ≥ 0.5. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the associations of socioeconomic, cognitive and imaging factors with dementia in men and women.Results Lower education affected dementia more in women than in men. Age, education, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and normalized whole-brain volume (nWBV) were associated with dementia in women whereas only MMSE and nWBV were associated with dementia in men. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with a reduced estimated total intracranial volume in men, but not in women. Ageing and lower MMSE scores were associated with reduced nWBV in both men and women.Conclusions The association between education and prevalence of dementia differs in men and women. Women may have more risk factors for dementia than men.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by the NIH training grant T32 NR016914 and Cleveland Clinic Foundation Internal Funds.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Washington University School of MedicineI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnalysis ata will be made available by the corresponding author to interested researchers upon request via email (Xuefeng.liu2{at}case.edu)