RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of Simple and Convenient Methods for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Wastewater in high and Low Resource Settings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.12.31.22284093
DO 10.1101/2022.12.31.22284093
A1 Liu, Pengbo
A1 Guo, Lizheng
A1 Cavallo, Matthew
A1 Cantrell, Caleb
A1 Hilton, Stephen Patrick
A1 Dunbar, Jillian
A1 Barbero, Robbie
A1 Barclay, Robert
A1 Sablon, Orlando III
A1 Wolfe, Marlene
A1 Lepene, Ben
A1 Moe, Christine
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/03/2022.12.31.22284093.abstract
AB Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA monitoring in wastewater has become an important tool for COVID-19 surveillance. Although many viral concentration methods such as membrane filtration and skim milk are reported, these methods generally require large volumes of wastewater, expensive lab equipment, and laborious processes. We utilized a Nanotrap® Microbiome A Particles (Nanotrap particle) method for virus concentration in wastewater. The method was evaluated across six parameters: pH, temperature, incubation time, wastewater volumes, RNA extraction methods, and two virus concentration approaches vs. a one-step method. The method was further evaluated with the addition of the Nanotrap Enhancement Reagent 1 (ER1) by comparing the automated vs. a manual Nanotrap particle method. RT-qPCR targeting the nucleocapsid protein was used for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Different pH, temperature, incubation time, wastewater volumes, and RNA extraction methods did not result in reduced SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater samples. The two-step concentration method showed significantly better results (P<0.01) than the one-step method. Adding ER1 to wastewater prior to viral concentration using the Nanotrap particles significantly improved PCR Ct results (P<0.0001) in 10 mL grab samples processed by automated Nanotrap particle method or 10 mL and 40 mL samples processed by manual Nanotrap particle method. SARS-CoV-2 detection in 10 mL grab samples with ER1 and the automated method showed significantly better (P=0.0008) results than 150 mL grab samples using the membrane filtration method. SARS-CoV-2 detection in 10 mL swab samples with ER1 via the automated method was also significantly better than without ER1 (P<0.0001) and the skim milk method in 250 mL Moore swab samples (P=0.012). These results suggest that Nanotrap methods could substitute the traditional membrane filtration and skim milk methods for viral concentration without compromising on the assay sensitivity. The manual method can be used in resource-limited areas, and the high-throughput platform is appropriate for large-scale COVID-19 wastewater-based surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the NIH Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) initiative (contract No. 75N92021C00012 to Ceres Nanosciences, Inc).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors