PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Dewald, Felix AU - Pirkl, Martin AU - Ahmadov, Elvin AU - Paluschinski, Martha AU - Kühn, Joachim AU - Elsner, Carina AU - Schulte, Bianca AU - Schlotz, Maike AU - Oral, Göksu AU - Knüfer, Jacqueline AU - Bernhard, Michael AU - Michael, Mark AU - Luxenburger, Maura AU - Andrée, Marcel AU - Hennies, Marc Tim AU - Hafezi, Wali AU - Müller, Marlin Maybrit AU - Kümpers, Philipp AU - Risse, Joachim AU - Kill, Clemens AU - Manegold, Randi Katrin AU - Frantzki, Ute von AU - Richter, Enrico AU - Emmert, Dorian AU - Monzon-Posadas, Werner O. AU - Gräff, Ingo AU - Kogej, Monika AU - Büning, Antonia AU - Baum, Maximilian AU - Teipel, Finn AU - Mochtarzadeh, Babak AU - Wolff, Martin AU - Gruell, Henning AU - Cristanziano, Veronica Di AU - Burst, Volker AU - Streeck, Hendrik AU - Dittmer, Ulf AU - Ludwig, Stephan AU - Timm, Jörg AU - Klein, Florian TI - Impaired humoral immunity to BQ.1.1 in convalescent and vaccinated patients AID - 10.1101/2022.12.31.22284088 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.12.31.22284088 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/03/2022.12.31.22284088.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/03/2022.12.31.22284088.full AB - Determining SARS-CoV-2 immunity is critical to assess COVID-19 risk and the need for prevention and mitigation strategies. We measured SARS-CoV-2 Spike/Nucleocapsid seroprevalence and serum neutralizing activity against Wu01, BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 in 1,411 individuals who received medical treatment in five emergency departments in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. We detected Spike-IgG in 95.6%, Nucleocapsid-IgG in 24.0% and neutralization against Wu01, BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 in 94.4%, 85.0%, and 73.8% of participants, respectively. Neutralization against BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 was reduced 5.6- and 23.4-fold compared to Wu01. Accuracy of S-IgG detection for determination of neutralizing activity against BQ.1.1 was reduced substantially. Furthermore, we explored previous vaccinations and infections as most important correlates of improved BQ.1.1 neutralization using multivariable and Bayesian network analyses. Given an adherence to COVID-19 vaccination recommendations of only 67.7% of all participants, we highlight the need for improvement of vaccine-uptake to reduce the COVID-19 risk in upcoming infection-waves with immune evasive variants.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided by the ministry for work, health, and social affairs of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (CPS-1-1F).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All samples and data were obtained under protocols approved by the ethics committees of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne (22_1262), of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn (314/22), of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duesseldorf (2022-2072), of the Medical Faculty of the University of Essen (22-10838-BO), and of the Medical Faculty of the University of Muenster (2022-490-b-S). All participants provided written informed consent. This study was registered as clinical trial (DRKS00029414).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors