RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Automated assessment of chest CT severity scores in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.12.28.22284027
DO 10.1101/2022.12.28.22284027
A1 Ajmera, Pranav
A1 Rathi, Snehal
A1 Dosi, Udayan
A1 Kalli, Suvarna Lakshmi
A1 Luthra, Avinav
A1 Khaladkar, Sanjay
A1 Pant, Richa
A1 Seth, Jitesh
A1 Mishra, Pranshu
A1 Gawali, Manish
A1 Pargaonkar, Yash
A1 Kulkarni, Viraj
A1 Kharat, Amit
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/30/2022.12.28.22284027.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed numerous lives in the last three years. With new variants emerging every now and then, the world is still battling with the management of COVID-19.Purpose To utilize a deep learning model for the automatic detection of severity scores from chest CT scans of COVID-19 patients and compare its diagnostic performance with experienced human readers.Methods A deep learning model capable of identifying consolidations and ground-glass opacities from the chest CT images of COVID-19 patients was used to provide CT severity scores on a 25-point scale for definitive pathogen diagnosis. The model was tested on a dataset of 469 confirmed COVID-19 cases from a tertiary care hospital. The quantitative diagnostic performance of the model was compared with three experienced human readers.Results The test dataset consisted of 469 CT scans from 292 male (average age: 52.30 ± 15.90 years) and 177 female (average age: 53.47 ± 15.24) patients. The standalone model had an MAE of 3.192, which was lower than the average radiologists’ MAE of 3.471. The model achieved a precision of 0.69 [0.65, 0.74] and an F1 score of 0.67 [0.62, 0.71], which was significantly superior to the average reader precision of 0.68 [0.65, 0.71] and F1 score of 0.65 [0.63, 0.67]. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.69 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.73] and specificity of 0.83 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.85], which was comparable to the performance of the three human readers, who had an average sensitivity of 0.71 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.73] and specificity of 0.84 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.85].Conclusion The AI model provided explainable results and performed at par with human readers in calculating CT severity scores from the chest CT scans of patients affected with COVID-19. The model had a lower MAE than that of the radiologists, indicating that the CTSS calculated by the AI was very close in absolute value to the CTSS determined by the reference standard.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Dr. D.Y. Patil Hospital, Pune, India. Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of our study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors