PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rojas, Luis AU - Ceron, Inés AU - Araos-Baeriswyl, Esteban AU - Viviani, Paola AU - Olivares, Rodrigo AU - Valenzuela, Andrés AU - Aizman, Andrés TI - Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns in Adult Patients Hospitalized for Community-acquired Urinary Tract Infection in Tertiary Hospitals in Chile AID - 10.1101/2022.12.27.22283981 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.12.27.22283981 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/30/2022.12.27.22283981.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/30/2022.12.27.22283981.full AB - Background The constant increase of factors associated with the presence of resistant strains makes empirical antibiotic selection a challenge in patients hospitalized for community-acquired urinary tract infection. We characterized the type of bacteria and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in cultures obtained from adult patients that needed hospitalization for this disease in two tertiary hospitals in Chile.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in adults hospitalized for community-acquired urinary tract infection between 2017 and 2022. A total of 830 patients were included. All patients with positive cultures were included in the analysis.Results Escherichia coli was the most frequent infectious agent (68.1%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (17.7%) and Enterococcus faecalis (6.7%). Among Enterobacteriaceae strains, 35.2%, 19.7% and 27.2% were resistant to first, second and third-generation cephalosporin, respectively. 36.9% were resistant to ciprofloxacin and 1.8% to amikacin. Gram-positive bacteria were resistant to oxacillin and ampicillin in 25% and 18%, respectively.Conclusion We detected a high prevalence of community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by bacteria resistant to commonly used antibiotics in adult patients that need to be hospitalized. In view of this, we believe that current medical guidelines should be reviewed and updated.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Health Sciences Scientific Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the Pontifical Catholic University and the South-East Metropolitan Health Service. Number ID 2003005003. No consent was required given that the data were obtained and analyzed anonymously.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.